ing in COBOL 6.3. They recommended that you should call
>IBM support and open a case.
>I hope this helps.
>Regards,
>Mitch McCluhan
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Frank Swarbrick
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Sent: Mon, Aug 16, 2021 2:46 pm
>Su
.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan
-Original Message-
From: Frank Swarbrick
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Aug 16, 2021 2:46 pm
Subject: Static CEEPCALL to COBOL 5/6
I have a very simple LE-enabled assembler program:
SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2
CALLER CEEENTRY MAIN=YES,RMODE
CEEPCALL COBTEST,MF=(E,) expands to:
DS0H
01-CEEPCALL
CEE0007F ALIAS C'COBTEST'
01-CEEPCALL
EXTRN CEE0007F
01-CEEPCALL
I cannot comment on the specific situations, but
- register 12 normally contains the address of the CEECAA control block,
when running under LE control
- at position 500 of the CEECAA, the address of the current active WSA
(writeable static area) is stored;
the WSA is related to the module to
I have a very simple LE-enabled assembler program:
SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2
CALLER CEEENTRY MAIN=YES,RMODE=ANY
CEEPCALL COBTEST,MF=(E,)
CEETERM
PPA CEEPPA ,
CEEDSA ,
