Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-20 Thread Peter Relson
On a z13 we could access data in the PSA in the 2048 to 4095 range without going into key 0. The specific field is PSASVT. If you can prove that, then please report it immediately as a defect. But I'd think you can't. Is it possible that you used to access the SVT via CVTSVT? Peter Relson

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Mike Hochee
0 9:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Strange S0C4 on z15 Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. The first machine to implement ESA/370 was the 3090E. This was done via microcode updates (since the 3090E hardware was designed prior to ESA). It was not pos

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Jim Mulder
TSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 08/19/2020 09:07 PM > Subject: Re: Strange S0C4 on z15 > Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" > > Some months ago I asked a question regarding the relevance of the > ORIGIN parm on a DSPSERV macro. During that time I came across older > doc

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Mike Hochee
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Strange S0C4 on z15 Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. Fetch-protection-override (cr0.38) allowed the OS to put fetch protection on page0 while allowing (legacy) access to 0-2047. Don't know which hardware level allowed exploitation. On Wed, 19 Aug

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Steve Smith
Seems like the real question is how does it work on a z13? 2048-4095 (x'800-FFF') are *supposed* to be key0 fetch-protected. "Fetch Protection Override" (CR0:38) is to allow everyone to fetch from 0-2047 (x'0-7FF'), while leaving 2048-4095 fetch protection in effect. It is not a new feature,

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Christopher Y. Blaicher
: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 4:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Strange S0C4 on z15 [ External - This message originated Externally. Use proper judgement and caution with attachments, links, or responses. ] So I had an S0C4 one time - turned out the vendor had used an instruction

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Lizette Koehler
Of Christopher Y. Blaicher Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 12:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Strange S0C4 on z15 We have a program that ran fine on a z13 that now gets an S0C4 on a z15. On a z13 we could access data in the PSA in the 2048 to 4095 range without going into key 0. The specific

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Binyamin Dissen
Fetch-protection-override (cr0.38) allowed the OS to put fetch protection on page0 while allowing (legacy) access to 0-2047. Don't know which hardware level allowed exploitation. On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:11:33 + "Christopher Y. Blaicher" wrote: :>We have a program that ran fine on a z13

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Christopher Y. Blaicher
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Beaver Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 3:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Strange S0C4 on z15 [ External - This message originated Externally. Use proper judgement and caution with attachments, links, or responses. ] What

Re: Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Steve Beaver
What was your zOS version and what is it now? Sent from my iPhone I promise you I can’t type or Spell on any smartphone > On Aug 19, 2020, at 14:21, Christopher Y. Blaicher > wrote: > > We have a program that ran fine on a z13 that now gets an S0C4 on a z15. > On a z13 we could access

Strange S0C4 on z15

2020-08-19 Thread Christopher Y. Blaicher
We have a program that ran fine on a z13 that now gets an S0C4 on a z15. On a z13 we could access data in the PSA in the 2048 to 4095 range without going into key 0. The specific field is PSASVT. To get to that data now, we have to do a MODESET to key zero. Anyone else find this as a problem?