Re: System Exit

W dniu 04.06.2020 o 15:46, Lizette Koehler pisze: Do you have any tools like EASYEXIT? Or ACC? Or BMC Tools (use to be Stop-X37 or PROSMS)? In ISMF You can set up a class to include dynamic volume count. In SMS environment we see Seq and VSAM regularly take up to 100's of extents when a

Re: System Exit

Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W. Sent: 04 June 2020 15:30 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: System Exit Does anybody have a system exit that has the ability to increase the secondary allocation for a data set, after "x" number

Re: System Exit

10 14 58 78 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: 04 June 2020 15:47 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: System Exit Do you have any tools like EASYEXIT? Or ACC? Or BMC Tools (use to be Stop-X37 or PROSMS)? In ISMF You can set

Re: System Exit

There are a couple of vendor products that could do this, including ours (SRS, which is our successor product to our original STOP-X37). You could, if you wanted to write your own IGGPRE00 exit, do this, but products such as SRS provide a lot more feature and function. Steve Pryor DTS

Re: System Exit

of our SMS DC's. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 9:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: System Exit [External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments.] Not sure an exit c

Re: System Exit

:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: System Exit Does anybody have a system exit that has the ability to increase the secondary allocation for a data set, after "x" number of extents? Confidentiality notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally

Re: System Exit

Not sure an exit can, IGGPRE? maybe, but SMS an SMS dataclas can using dynamic volume count, something like what STOPX-37 did Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "RICHARD W. PINION" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 8:30:13 AM Subject: S

Re: System Exit

The only PRODUCT I know of is Stop-X37 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W. Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 8:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: System Exit Does anybody have a system exit that has

System Exit

Does anybody have a system exit that has the ability to increase the secondary allocation for a data set, after "x" number of extents? Confidentiality notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged and/or confidential informati

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

AIN@listserv.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit > > Our SMF exits still use IEFYS to write messages to the job output stream. > If there were some other 'more modern' method, I'd use it, but I know of > none. As for doc, I've never found any. I just call the interf

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 3:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit Our SMF exits still use IEFYS to write messages to the job output stream. If there were some other 'more

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

of David Spiegel Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 9:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit 1. If nobody was using IEFYS, how else would the flower box be printed? On 2018-11-24 14:48, Seymour J Metz wrote: > 1. IEFYS is a really old interface; I did

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

9h80ESrAaOCWmwnBWaw3y3cs%2BA%3Dreserved=0 > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of > Steff Gladstone > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 3:53 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate syst

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 11:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit 1

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Steff Gladstone Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 3:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit Three questions regarding IEFACTRT: 1. Where is use of IEFYS for writing messages

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:31:08 -0500, Peter Relson wrote: > >"Can dynamically allocate" is not the same as to "can use BPXWDYN". I >would guess that you cannot use BPXWDYN except from within the jobstep >program task tree. Why did you not post the return information from your >BPXWDYN? That might

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

I am abending on S0C4 because getmained areas are automatically being freed at end of step, before IEFACTRT gets control. It is not clear to me if SUBPOOL alone can solve the problem. Do I need to specify TCBADDR=TCBJSTCB on the STORAGE macro so that the "input TCB" is the job-step TCB? What

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 22:53:11 +0200, Steff Gladstone wrote: >Three questions regarding IEFACTRT: > >1. Where is use of IEFYS for writing messages to the JOBLOG documented? >The example given in the documentation for IEFACTRT is incomplete. Google >doesn't seem to locate the doc as well. > >2. I

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 6:20 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit > > Peter Relson wrote: > > >When the facility was developed, we took a stab at which existing exits > that we thought were most likely to be

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit Peter Relson wrote: >When the facility was developed, we took a stab at which existing exits that >we thought were most likely to be of help to the most customers. And I'd hope >that new exits use it. Tha

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

Peter Relson wrote: >When the facility was developed, we took a stab at which existing exits that >we thought were most likely to be of help to the most customers. And I'd hope >that new exits use it. That was one of the best stabs I got from Big Blue. It saved me an unneeded IPL when one of

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

Otherwise you can hook the standard LOAD/LINK/ATTACH SVCs. Please do not do that. There is a long history of applications getting this wrong. It is unfortunate that hooking of any SVC was ever viewed as acceptable practice. But in the absence of suitable exits, it can be understandable.

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

assuming we are careful to return R15=0 in our exit routines and not change anything in the passed parameters, could that still affect or override in any way the results of the default or system exit routines already in effect for those exit points? No, it could not. (Now why certain IBM

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

in IBM components continue not to use it is another matter.) Steff Gladstone wrote: [...] > (or issue the equivalent CSVDYNEX macro in an assembler program) to add our > exit routines to the system exit points SYS.IEFUSI AND SYS.IEFACTRT, [...] I would just watch for two possible trouble areas:

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit After a respite of several months this topic has gotten hot again for us. We believe that using the IEFUSI and IEFACTRT exits answer our need to gain control at job-step initialization and again at job-step termination. My

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

command SETPROG EXIT,ADD,EX=,MOD=,LAST (or issue the equivalent CSVDYNEX macro in an assembler program) to add our exit routines to the system exit points SYS.IEFUSI AND SYS.IEFACTRT, and assuming we are careful to return R15=0 in our exit routines and not change

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

Steff Gladstone wrote: >In our installation we would like to implement certain checks and document >certain run-time characteristics at the beginning and during program >initialization and duration (chiefly Cobol programs). What checks? >We would like to implement this in a manner

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:13:47 +0200, Steff Gladstone wrote: >In our installation we would like to implement certain checks and document >certain run-time characteristics at the beginning and during program >initialization and duration ... > >We are looking at initialization routines like CEEBINT.

Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit

Can you give an example or two? On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:13:47 +0200 Steff Gladstone wrote: :>In our installation we would like to implement certain checks and document :>certain run-time characteristics at the beginning and during program :>initialization and duration

Looking for an appropriate system exit

Greetings, In our installation we would like to implement certain checks and document certain run-time characteristics at the beginning and during program initialization and duration (chiefly Cobol programs). We would like to implement this in a manner transparent to the application, without