In 006101ceb8b8$8fd70610$af851230$@mcn.org, on 09/23/2013
at 04:56 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
Unicode is not a character set
Sure it is.
If it's UTF-
UTF-8 is a transform, not a character set, even though you can specify
it in charset for MIME.
If it's UTF-16 or UCS-2 you can
In 9791327634617405.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
09/23/2013
at 09:43 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
o (not mentioned) A simple byte-by-byte lexical sort doesn't
sort into UNICODE code point order (but I'm guessing). This
may not be very important.
I suspect
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:18:30 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
The C++ committee wanted to deprecate trigraphs in the last standard
http://tinyurl.com/n3nas3u. EBCDIC was the only tangible reason
for keeping them alive. I've lost count of the amount of times I've had
a C/C++ analysis tool choke
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 4:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: UNICODE to EBCDIC
z/OS Unicode Services is an AWESOME facility but there is a little bit of a
learning curve (or coding curve if there is such a thing
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:54:44 -0500, Donald Likens dlik...@infosecinc.com
wrote:
WebSphere Application Server supplies some of its information in its SMF
records in Unicode format. Is there a facility available to convert Unicode to
EBCDIC?
Suggest structured Internet search argument
WebSphere Application Server supplies some of its information in its SMF
records in Unicode format. Is there a facility available to convert Unicode to
EBCDIC?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
On 9/23/2013 9:54 AM, Donald Likens wrote:
WebSphere Application Server supplies some of its information in its SMF
records in Unicode format. Is there a facility available to convert Unicode to
EBCDIC?
Which EBCDIC code page would you like?
Check out Unicode Services User's Guide
: 214 350 3694 – prefer email, still works
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Donald Likens
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: UNICODE to EBCDIC
WebSphere Application Server
COBOL provides
the way to describe UNICODE fields, EBCDIC fields, and ISO 8 byte
character fields, I am fairly certain simple MOVE statements among
them would suffice.
Clark Morris
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.comwrote:
On 9/23/2013 10:22 AM, John McKown wrote:
If you mean a program, then the UNIX iconv command can do that. There is
also the iconv set of C language subroutines if you want to write your
own.
On 9/23/2013 10:22 AM, John McKown wrote:
If you mean a program, then the UNIX iconv command can do that. There is
also the iconv set of C language subroutines if you want to write your
own.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/edclb1c0/3.440
On 9/23/2013 12:02 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:44:04 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
On 9/23/2013 10:22 AM, John McKown wrote:
If you mean a program, then the UNIX iconv command can do that. There is
also the iconv set of C language subroutines if you want to write your
own.
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:44:04 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
On 9/23/2013 10:22 AM, John McKown wrote:
If you mean a program, then the UNIX iconv command can do that. There is
also the iconv set of C language subroutines if you want to write your
own.
For official character conversion in assembler, see the IBM manual z/OS
Unicode Services User's Guide and Reference which documents use of their
unicode services.
Jon Perryman.
From: Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
Actually, COBOL has the builtin
If you mean a program, then the UNIX iconv command can do that. There is
also the iconv set of C language subroutines if you want to write your
own.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/edclb1c0/3.440
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/cbcpg1c0/8.6.3
of
character sets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode. If it's UTF-8 then you
can do a 98% job if you just treat it as ASCII. If it's UTF-16 or UCS-2 you can
do a 98% job if you just discard bytes 0, 2, 4, ... and treat bytes 1, 2, 5,
... as ASCII.
There is actually a Unicode EBCDIC (UTF-EBCDIC
represented big-endian
in storage but little-endian in network transmission.
There is actually a Unicode EBCDIC (UTF-EBCDIC) but it's pretty obscure.
Not as obscure as it deserves to be.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: UNICODE to EBCDIC
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:56:46 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
Unicode is not a character set (or format) -- it's a whole family of
character sets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode. If it's UTF-8 then you
can do a 98% job if you just treat it as ASCII. If it's
On 23 September 2013 20:18, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:56:46 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
There is actually a Unicode EBCDIC (UTF-EBCDIC) but it's pretty obscure.
Not as obscure as it deserves to be.
Never miss a chance on this one, do you Gil... As you
Paul Gilmartin's opinions about EBCDIC are not always or necessarily
wrong in detail, but they are wholly predictable.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On 9/23/13, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Gilmartin's opinions about EBCDIC are not always or necessarily
wrong in detail, but they are wholly predictable.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:23:04 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
Not as obscure as it deserves to be.
Never miss a chance on this one, do you Gil... As you know, I think
UTF-EBCDIC was a great idea, and can't understand how it failed to
catch on. Maybe there's just not much call for invoking legacy
On 24/09/2013 10:43 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
It doesn't say (but perhaps TR # 16 does) which EBCDIC code page
(or for that matter, which flavor of ASCII -- ISO8859-??) is used.
This could be chaotic. And the dreadful LF-NEL pitfall lurks.
ASCII suffers similar problems; else why would we have
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:18:30 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
The C++ committee wanted to deprecate trigraphs in the last standard
http://tinyurl.com/n3nas3u. EBCDIC was the only tangible reason
for keeping them alive. I've lost count of the amount of times I've had
a C/C++ analysis tool choke
24 matches
Mail list logo
