convention
Nazis?)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Ron Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 10:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Unit-count default with UNIT=group-name?
Charles,
Yes you have
Subject: Re: Unit-count default with UNIT=group-name?
Thanks all.
I think I am either 100% safe or about 99.99% safe without changing the
JCL.
If it turns out to be .01% unsafe I will cross that bridge when I come to
it.
Barbara, my application is named the IBM Enterprise COBOL compiler so I
I'm looking at the Enterprise COBOL V5.1 U/G which says that SYSUT5, 6, 7
and 15 must all be single-volume allocations.
If I code SPACE=(CYL,(2,2,0)),UNIT=SYSDA is that implicitly a request for
only one volume, or might z/OS give me one cylinder each on two volumes or a
secondary allocation on a
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Unit-count default with UNIT=group-name?
I'm looking at the Enterprise COBOL V5.1 U/G which says that SYSUT5, 6, 7
and
15 must all be single-volume allocations.
If I code SPACE=(CYL,(2,2,0)),UNIT=SYSDA
If I code SPACE=(CYL,(2,2,0)),UNIT=SYSDA is that implicitly a request for
only one volume, or might z/OS give me one cylinder each on two volumes or a
secondary allocation on a second device (assuming, of course, that SYSDA
were multiple volumes, as it usually would be)?
I just tried to get a
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] Unit-count default with UNIT=group-name?
I'm looking at the Enterprise COBOL V5.1 U/G
