Re: Very large tables/ records in COBOL was Re: Unused variables

2013-09-23 Thread Steve Comstock
On 9/23/2013 10:55 AM, Clark Morris wrote: On 23 Sep 2013 06:09:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: Adjacent 01 levels have been used to allocate storage larger than the maximum allowed by COBOL. With the more recent versions of COBOL is the practice still necessary or can the

Very large tables/ records in COBOL was Re: Unused variables

2013-09-23 Thread Clark Morris
On 23 Sep 2013 06:09:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: Adjacent 01 levels have been used to allocate storage larger than the maximum allowed by COBOL. With the more recent versions of COBOL is the practice still necessary or can the tables be large enough? Given the existence of