about Re: WER027A
control field beyond record:
Robert:
My memory has faded a lot but IIRC there are regularly SMF records
that are "short" all the time.
Without digging into the books too much I would print a few out and
find which type is the short ones and exclude those before th
There is the VLTEST parameter that can be specified as a PARM= option or as a
$ORTPARM parameter. There are eight possible tests that it can perform, but
for the OPS case there is only one answer.
He should specify VLTEST=0, which says, for purposes of comparison, any short
key fields will be p
4, at 3:56 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 13:28 + on 02/14/2014, Chase, John wrote about Re: WER027A
control field beyond record:
> -Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Micheal Butz
Seems like one of my sort fields maybe beyond a short reco
At 13:28 + on 02/14/2014, Chase, John wrote about Re: WER027A
control field beyond record:
> -Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Micheal Butz
Seems like one of my sort fields maybe beyond a short record
Anything I can do about this
DFSORT
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Micheal Butz
>
> Seems like one of my sort fields maybe beyond a short record Anything I can
> do about this
DFSORT has an OPTION VLSHRT to handle that situation. I'm confident that
Syncsort has something similar i
At 19:45 -0500 on 02/13/2014, Micheal Butz wrote about Re: WER027A
control field beyond record:
SORT FIELDS=(150,4,4,4,A,158,17,A),FORMAT=BI
MODS.E35=(SORTEX,2,STEPLIB)
END
There are a number of records less than 158
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
I assume that your records are V not
> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>> Behalf Of Micheal Butz
>> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:40 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: WER027A control field beyond record
>
TESTI is if you are using INCLUDE or OMIT.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Micheal Butz
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:40 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: WER027A control f
icheal Butz
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WER027A control field beyond record
VLTESTI=1. Cannt figure out were it goes
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Alan Field wrote:
>
> Isn't there a VLSHORT keyword you
It's a parm on the EXEC (I think :)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Micheal Butz
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:40 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: WER027A cont
;
> Phone: 651.662.3546 Mobile: 651.428.8826
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Micheal Butz"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
> Date: 02/13/2014 18:46
> Subject:Re: WER027A control field beyond record
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion L
Re: WER027A control field beyond record
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
SORT FIELDS=(150,4,4,4,A,158,17,A),FORMAT=BI
MODS.E35=(SORTEX,2,STEPLIB)
END
There are a number of records less than 158
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Ed Gould w
SORT FIELDS=(150,4,4,4,A,158,17,A),FORMAT=BI
MODS.E35=(SORTEX,2,STEPLIB)
END
There are a number of records less than 158
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
>
> Michael:
>
> There are several possibilities, but from no real description on what yo
Michael:
There are several possibilities, but from no real description on what
you are doing its difficult to suggest anything. ie no display of
sort control cards etc...
Ed
On Feb 13, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Seems like one of my sort fields maybe beyond a short record
Anyt
Seems like one of my sort fields maybe beyond a short record
Anything I can do about this
This
Sent from my iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with t
15 matches
Mail list logo
