Was: X86 server - Competitive economic advantage of System z plus z/OS compared with x86 plus (Linux or windoze)

2012-08-26 Thread Arthur Fichtl
Just an additional comment to the past discussions. I agree that a big MF installation (e.g. running a number of sysplexes of z10 EC CECs or z196 with a number of say 10 to 50 LPARs) has in fact no reason to migrate to Intel based machines. I was working for a Bavarian manufacturing company

Re: Was: X86 server - Competitive economic advantage of System z plus z/OS compared with x86 plus (Linux or windoze)

2012-08-26 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:06:13 +0200, Arthur Fichtl wrote: OTOH, if you look at the global big new companies (e.g. Google, Amazon, Facebook), nobody of them is running MF systems because these companies are not captivated by legacy systems. Instead, Google (as known to the public) is running a

Re: Was: X86 server - Competitive economic advantage of System z plus z/OS compared with x86 plus (Linux or windoze)

2012-08-26 Thread Ed Gould
On Aug 26, 2012, at 6:06 AM, Arthur Fichtl wrote: SNIP- OTOH, if you look at the global big new companies (e.g. Google, Amazon, Facebook), nobody of them is running MF systems because these companies are not captivated by legacy systems.

Re: Was: X86 server - Competitive economic advantage of System z plus z/OS compared with x86 plus (Linux or windoze)

2012-08-26 Thread Scott Ford
I saw the same exercise in a pharm. company trying to go from MVS, multiple Lpars to unix. Several millions of $$$ and it was a bustsome applications were difficult to convert Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Aug 26, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net wrote: On Aug