On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:30:42 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
>Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs.
Chuck Norris doesn't need a a Web App to apply PTFs, he just roundhouse kicks
them in.
Art Gutowski
General Motors, LLC
HI Terri,
I'm happy you finally got the server up, but sorry to see that you aren't happy
with the new format of the upgrade materials for z/OS! If you'd like, please
email me your entire list, and we can work through them. Some pieces might be
fixed by changing the content of the Upgrade
-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage
External Email
Hi Terri,
You re
Hi Terri,
You re-ran IZUSETUP, not recently right? That was made obsolete way back on
z/OS V2.1 with APAR PI54286 (2016), to move to the "modern" parmlib (IZUPRMxx)
method. I hope you still aren't using that, and don't have the server running
on your z/OS V2.1 system but rather on a higher
-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 8:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage
External Email
On 3/26/2020 5
On 3/26/2020 5:45 PM, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
It then immediately fails stating z/OSMF cant talk to the 2.1 lpar, because
there is no IP address under the SYSTEM tab in z/OSMF.
What do you see when you open the Systems tab? Do you see an entry for
all 5 of your sysplex members, including your
So I have a few questions I was wondering if someone can explain to me?
We are a software development company that have 5 lpars in a SYSPLEX. 1 - z/OS
2.3 , 3 - z/OS 2.2 and 1 - z/OS 2.1, because of developers.
Yes I know the 2.1 is unsupported and this is where my questions start.
I have
