Chris,
If I remember rightly it was a bug in IMS 2.2 or 2.3. If I remember
correctly NAB (where I worked at the time) had found the bug in stress and
regression testing (TPNS for those that remember it) and were waiting for
the fix that hit Westpac. Funny how times have changed.
Ron
Wayne,
Hmm I seem to remember a past-tapes-processed file that prevented CEMTEX and
other exchange files, value and non-value being processed twice in the File
Exchange part of NAB's batch. The tape was just a holdover from an old
naming convention, but it used to prevent files from being
Nostalgia, don't you just love it.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
Asia/Pacific representatives for
Innovation Data Processing, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Ron Hawkins
Sent:
hi all,
what is the best method to achieve a complete list of all currently
cataloged data sets? really all. actually, like using ** in the 3.4
data set criterion.
is there actually the need to determine all catalogs/aliases, and perform
(recursiveley) list on them, ...
thanks for any info.
Techie,
Your statement suggests that only internal drives have P-i-T IO consistency
with replication products like TrueCopy and HUR. This is not correct. For
virtualized midrange disks, synchronous and asynchronous replication is
handled by the Enterprise Array providing the virtualization, not
Steve,
Actually it is sort of disappointing that some of the practices that made
this stuff bullet proof are being pigeon holed as legacy systems and
removed from the process.
A bit like throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Depends (maybe) on what you mean by really all.
Some years ago I was playing with the CSI and it found *all* the
catalogs and datasets within them.
- including an MCAT for another system that was connected as a UCAT
- and including an MCAT for another system that was *NOT* connected as a
UCAT.
Dr. Stephen Fedtke wrote:
what is the best method to achieve a complete list of all currently
cataloged data sets? really all. actually, like using ** in the 3.4 data
set
criterion.
Use Catalog Search Interface with Assembler or REXX.
It is faster than =3.4 or IDCAMS LISTC and perhaps ISMF
Time slice? Normally PR/SM is running interrupt driven, not time sliced unless
you tell configure it so.
Actually, PR/SM always works with time slices (50ms IIRC).
But, weights are only enforced when there is processor constraint.
The HIPERVISOR doles out CPU in slice increments based on
I'm sorry; I should have worded that differently. I did not mean 'time slice'
per se but rather the weight assigned to each LPAR. This is a constrained
system so as Ted points out the weights are being enforced.
David O'Brien
NIH Contractor
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL
So 64 bit mode is like a Dataspace
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:09 AM, Chris Craddock crashlu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Gerhard Adam gada...@charter.net
wrote:
How would you branch to code above the 2GB bar, since none is allowed
there?
The
So 64 bit mode is like a Dataspace
The immediate problem addressed by amode 64 was to move data above the bar.
Hence the current similarity to dataspaces. However, the architecture supports
64 bit execution; the problem is that the operating system doesn't. As Chris
Craddock pointed out, many
So we are waiting for waitting for IBM
To introduce a new control block the RBX. (rb extension for 64 bit gpr
and new rbopsw). There should be a lot contracting jobs opening up in
POK
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2010, at 6:48 AM, Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.com
wrote:
So 64
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d5e05...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 11/30/2010
at 11:49 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
There is an integrated 3270 emulator on the HMC. However, it is
__NOT__ supported by z/OS. I know that z/VM supports it. z/VM calls
this the SYSG
In mm5af61vbrcsh8q2936g0d195sbvh16...@4ax.com, on 11/30/2010
at 11:26 AM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
Security is not that high a priority in many organizations where the
mantra is get the job done whatever it takes.
ITYM get part of the job done even if it sabotages another
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 7:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Z10 BC SNA Console
In
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:38:58 -0500, Micheal Butz wrote:
So 64 bit mode is like a Dataspace
No, it isn't.
A data space requires that you run in AR mode (or secondary space mode).
Using 64-bit mode allows you to access memory above 2GB within the same
address space. It increases the available
Either or both!
SNIP
ARM Couple datasesr and OMVS Couple dataset?
1) Yes you can define these files and policies. A CF is not needed for
this.
2) an OMVS couple dataset would only be needed if there are multiple
images sharing HFS/ZFS files, See the Setting up a SYSPLEX books (I
believe this
You are correct SIR
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:38:58 -0500, Micheal Butz wrote:
So 64 bit mode is like a Dataspace
No, it isn't.
A data space requires that you run in AR mode (or secondary space
So we are waiting for waitting for IBM To introduce a new control block the
RBX. (rb extension for 64 bit gpr
and new rbopsw). There should be a lot contracting jobs opening up in POK
The same thing happened with 370 to XA, and probably with revolutions in
previous versions (I wasn't there
On 11/30/2010 10:34 PM, Jim Phoenix wrote:
Mike Schwab wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
deleted
My same source related the tale of a person in same bank who received
an EBCDIC file, opened it in Windows and saved it back as ASCII. The
file was
I had a similar requirement a few months back because for some reason, they
have NJE locked up real tight around here.
I created a rexx routine that basically ftps the spool file to the intended
lpar
by ip address.
I initiate the process by performing an SE on the spool entry and then typing
Thanks Gilbert.
I have to be able to do the action to all output in a certain output
class via a interval driven process.
I am still leaning toward the spool offload process.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe
I have a TS3500 that is to be setup as in library-managed and not system-
managed for encryption. In the process I came across this statement in the
EKM manual for setting up the encryption.
Configure 3592 E05, E06, or EU6 tape drives for Encryption.
a. If 3592 E05, E06, or EU6 tape drives are
I don't think this is what you will want, but I'll just throw it out there
anyway. Have you considered running two JES2 systems on system #1? The second
JES2 would be, say, JESA. You could then NJE from JES2 to JESA on system #1,
then NJE from JESA on system #1 to the JES2 on system #2. I'm not
Is there additional information about CPU time for DFSORT in the SMF Type 16
record that is not in the Type 30 step record. In other words, are there any
circumstances where CPU time data is written to the Type 16 records and not
to the Type 30 records? Do you see step information for DFSORT CPU
The same thing happened with 370 to XA, and probably with revolutions in
previous versions (I wasn't there for them).
Actually it wasn't the same, since the size of the registers/PSW didn't
change during that entire period. Therefore, while their usage changed,
there were no
Issues related to
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:51:17, Jaco Kruger
jaco.kru...@riyadbank.com wrote:
We are in the process of upgrading from a z900 to a Z9. Bothr CECs contain a
Production CF LPAR, Production and Development LPAR. The second CEC also
contains 2 Sandbox CF LPARs and 2 Sandbox LPARs.
We want to move 1
Russell Mike -
Our MDL configuration has 2 nodes, but in this case, 841C 8401 are both
on the same node.
The part I'm having a hard time understanding is that the MDL appears to
mount the correct tape every time for the pool requested - as in the
example I gave previously - if TMS001
To begin with a kudos, Ted MacNeil wrote:
begin snippet
Especially with the requirements for backwards compatability (sic) it will not
spring forward as Athena from the forehead of Zeus.
/end snippet
and I want to acknowledge that he got this classical allusion right. His
spelling of of the
Well, I thought about that, but I don't think that works either. JESA
would have to know about both JES2's of the same name, and that still
doesn't work(at least that is my understanding).
Someone correct me if I am wrong.please. I think it would take JES2
- JESA - JESB - JES2
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:53:55 -0800, Gerhard Adam wrote:
The same thing happened with 370 to XA, and probably with revolutions in
previous versions (I wasn't there for them).
Actually it wasn't the same, since the size of the registers/PSW didn't
change during that entire period. Therefore, while
DFSORT reports cpu time in field ICECPUT. This is basically the step TCB
time accumulated between the sort start time and the sort end time. So
that time is a subset of the TCB time reported in type 30 records. Also
keep in mind that it also means if there are things like user written E15
and
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:35:02 -0600, Staller, Allan
allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote:
2) an OMVS couple dataset would only be needed if there are multiple
images sharing HFS/ZFS files, See the Setting up a SYSPLEX books (I
believe this is a redbook)
Depending on the size of the shop, there may be
I have a TS3500 that is to be setup as in library-managed and not
system-
managed for encryption. In the process I came across this statement in
the
EKM manual for setting up the encryption.
Configure 3592 E05, E06, or EU6 tape drives for Encryption.
a. If 3592 E05, E06, or EU6 tape
On 11/30/2010 7:43 PM, Gerhard Adam wrote:
How would you branch to code above the 2GB bar, since none is allowed there?
You can use an ordinary branch instruction (e.g., BASSM 14,15) to branch to code
above the bar. If you're running enabled, you won't execute for long... :-D
The obvious
a little of topic
that's why we still keep our trusty local escon attached 3174's
when all else fails can still access system
saw our net guy turn green 4am one Sunday when nothing worked IP TN OSA
good old dumb 3270 term allowed him to back out changes
I would appreciate any notes.
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 12/01/2010 09:37 AM
Subject:Re: TS3500 and encryption
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
I have a TS3500 that is to be setup as in
Hi Michael,
When DFSORT is invoked from another program (like DSNUTILB), SMF 30-4 (step)
will contain the total CPU time for the entire step and SMF 16 (one or more)
will contain CPU time accumulated while DFSORT was running.
HTH,
Yifat
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
ICC serves the same function. IMO, there is no need to keep an external
console controller anymore.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:48 AM, August Carideo august.cari...@avon.comwrote:
a little of topic
that's why we still keep our trusty local escon attached 3174's
when all else fails can still
On 30 Nov 2010 07:42:00 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: A New Threat for password
On 1 December 2010 10:46, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
You can use an ordinary branch instruction (e.g., BASSM 14,15) to branch to
code above the bar. If you're running enabled, you won't execute for long...
:-D
Just how does it fail? Is the PSW instruction address
Clark is obviously not an NCIS fan. Google Abby Sciuto (spelling corrected)
Dennis Roach
GHG Corporation
Lockheed Martin Mission Services
Facilities Design and Operations Contract
Strategic Technical Engineering
NASA/JSC
Address:
2100 Space Park Drive
LM-15-4BH
Houston, Texas 77058
Abigail Abby Sciuto is a fictional character from the NCIS television
series by CBS Television, and is portrayed by Pauley Perrette.
Clark Morris
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
On 1 December 2010 10:46, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
You can use an ordinary branch instruction (e.g., BASSM 14,15) to branch
to
code above the bar. If you're running enabled, you won't execute for
On 30 November 2010 22:57, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an idea to bounce around. z/OS Unix System Services does a
lot of work converting ASCII to EBCDIC and back.
I'm puzzled by this. What is all this conversion work that takes to
much time and effort? To the extent
The only thing I see 16 bytes in the PSA is PSAPCPSW
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
On 1 December 2010 10:46, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
You can use an ordinary branch instruction (e.g., BASSM 14,15) to
branch to
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:25:54 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
It is, though, curious that there must be, as Paul Gilmartin points
out, quite a bit of infrastructure already there in support of 64-bit
addresses. The real PSW is at all times beyond the early stage of IPL
a zArch one of 128 bits, and it
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Ron Hawkins
ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
If I remember rightly it was a bug in IMS 2.2 or 2.3. If I remember
correctly NAB (where I worked at the time) had found the bug in stress and
regression testing (TPNS for those that remember it) and were waiting
You're probably right.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message
On 12/1/2010 8:32 AM, Chris Craddock wrote:
PSW in a normal 8 byte PSW field when the instruction address is only 4
bytes. As you can probably imagine, there is literally no way to preserve
compatibility with the near infinite number of programs that currently
understand and inspect the task
On 12/1/2010 8:41 AM, Micheal Butz wrote:
The only thing I see 16 bytes in the PSA is PSAPCPSW
When running in z/Architecture mode, *all* old/new PSWs in the PSA are 16 bytes
long (see PoOp for details).
Currently, the PSW save areas in z/OS task management control blocks are only
eight
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: OT: In regard to password cracking Who is Abbie
Sciuto was Re: A New Threat for password
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:32:41 -0600, Chris Craddock wrote:
there is a technique called PSW scrunching that allows saving an extended
PSW in a normal 8 byte PSW field when the instruction address is only 4
bytes.
That implies, doesn't it, that in addition to the top 32 bits of the
instruction
I dare say code/storage I was trying to move above the line 1.5 decades
ago in a prior life is still not there. Another example of the 80/20
90/10 rule. When 80-90% of a complex project are done, the enthusiasm and
therefore funding for the last bit diminishes considerably.
IBM Mainframe
In 000301cb9101$2f0b5de0$8d2219...@net, on 11/30/2010
at 09:40 PM, michealbutz michealb...@optonline.net said:
From what I understand running in 64 bit mode (SAM64) you have to
run disabled does the SAM64 instruction do that
What gave you that idea?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
In aanlkti=29p26ome3vbcev6ldfhu-jpwd09cv5sgxt...@mail.gmail.com, on
11/30/2010
at 09:57 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
Here is an idea to bounce around. z/OS Unix System Services does a
lot of work converting ASCII to EBCDIC and back. z/Linux works all
in ASCII.
I doubt it.
In 018b01cb9109$e3dc7440$ab955c...@net, on 11/30/2010
at 07:43 PM, Gerhard Adam gada...@charter.net said:
How would you branch to code above the 2GB bar, since none is allowed
there?
B or BR.
The obvious problem being how you would even get it loaded up there.
MVC.
If I recall, the
In 3b16b7d1-bc6b-444e-b44f-427bfa164...@optonline.net, on 12/01/2010
at 07:03 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net said:
So we are waiting for waitting for IBM
To introduce a new control block the RBX. (rb extension for 64 bit
gpr and new rbopsw). There should be a lot contracting jobs
Nothing like that is required. My understanding is that when the PSW is
stored it is compressed down to an ESA/390 PSW format (check bit 12) and
expanded when it is reloaded. There is no point at which an 8-byte PSW is
active in any sense.
There are indeed many programs that inspect the 8-byte
In 47e662a7-431a-4af9-b35e-0127def03...@optonline.net, on 12/01/2010
at 06:38 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net said:
So 64 bit mode is like a Dataspace
No, 64-bit mode means that addresses are 64 bits. That applies to
references to address spaces just as much as it does to
would take JES2 - JESA - JESB - JES2
Interesting puzzle. Seems to me that still wouldn't work, since JESA would
need to know about JES2 (left) because it's connected to it, and JES2
(right) in order to know it needs to route traffic destined for JES2 (right)
via
JESB.
Dana
Is this Windows or z/OS data that you are encrypting? We use library
managed encryption for our Windows data and system managed encryption
for our native and VTS data.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Michael Saraco
Sent:
On 12/1/2010 9:49 AM, Gerhard Adam wrote:
Nothing like that is required. My understanding is that when the PSW is
stored it is compressed down to an ESA/390 PSW format (check bit 12) and
expanded when it is reloaded. There is no point at which an 8-byte PSW is
active in any sense.
Huh? We're
We had no problems with performing this upgrade earlier this year. It
seemed transparent to the COBOL development staff.
Note: We were not using any of the XML features in Ver 3.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
An IDCAMS batch job (not TSO) with the command
LISTCAT USERCATALOG
will give you the name of all the catalogs connected to your master catalog.
You can then issue multiple commands (also in batch)
LISTCAT ALL CATALOG(dsn)
to list all the datasets, aliases, etc that are in each.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:31:11 -0800, Schwarz, Barry A wrote:
If you have catalogs not connected to the master catalog, you
will have to find them some other way. I don't think you can list
one until it is connected.
Right. Because a catalog that is not connected is not cataloged.
Of course,
Huh? We're discussing how to get around that restriction.
The point is that there is nothing to get around. Executable code isn't
supported about 2GB for numerous reasons already mentioned. Therefore the
middle 64-bits of the z/architecture PSW only contain zeros. Compressing
the PSW doesn't
On 12/1/2010 12:13 PM, Gerhard Adam wrote:
Once again, there's nothing to get around, since it simply isn't allowed.
Allow me to rephrase: I was discussing how IBM can address this restriction in a
future z/OS release. Just repeating the existing restriction over and over adds
nothing to
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:13:46 -0800, Gerhard Adam wrote:
Huh? We're discussing how to get around that restriction.
The point is that there is nothing to get around. Executable code isn't
supported about 2GB for numerous reasons already mentioned. Therefore the
middle 64-bits of the
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 12/01/2010
11:25:54 AM:
You can use an ordinary branch instruction (e.g., BASSM 14,15) to
branch to
code above the bar. If you're running enabled, you won't execute
for long... :-D
Just how does it fail? Is the PSW instruction
Hi
Now that I realize that only current use for above the bar addressing
is storage at this time at least which is older dataspace or 64 bit
addressabilty
Sent from my iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Micheal,
I'm rather curious, I've been wondering what company you are developing this
software for?
Scott
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.netwrote:
Hi
Now that I realize that only current use for above the bar addressing is
storage at this time at least
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 03:33:24 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
Dr. Stephen Fedtke wrote:
what is the best method to achieve a complete list of all currently
cataloged data sets? really all. actually, like using ** in the 3.4
data set
criterion.
Use Catalog Search
Who says I'm developing anything
Dataspaces are more painfully and probably slower then regular storage
dataspaces were probably meant to
Releive storage constriant
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
Micheal,
I'm rather curious, I've
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:08:19 -0500 Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
:Now that I realize that only current use for above the bar addressing
:is storage at this time at least which is older dataspace or 64 bit
:addressabilty
Dataspaces (which are limited to 2G) were first.
Just
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:37:03 -0500 Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
:Who says I'm developing anything
:Dataspaces are more painfully and probably slower then regular storage
Is AR mode slower than primary mode?
:dataspaces were probably meant to
:Releive storage constriant
michealb...@optonline.net (Micheal Butz) writes:
Who says I'm developing anything
Dataspaces are more painfully and probably slower then regular storage
dataspaces were probably meant to
Releive storage constriant
multiple address spaces started in 811 (for nov78 date on the
documents)
there is a technique called PSW scrunching that allows saving an
extended
PSW in a normal 8 byte PSW field when the instruction address is only 4
bytes.
That implies, doesn't it, that in addition to the top 32 bits of the
instruction address, 32 other bits in the 128-bit PSW are irrelevant
:Dataspaces are more painfully and probably slower then regular storage
Is AR mode slower than primary mode?
An AR mode storage reference is slower only when
the ALET is not 0 (promary) or 1 (secondary), and there
is no match in the ALB. The is analogous to DAT-on
being slower than
Perhaps you believe that IBM will *never* support code above the line. I
don't happen to think that they are that short-sighted. We have already
seen that thee loader can load data-only CSECTs above the bar. I suspect
that there is more to come.
Depends on what you mean by support code.
There are also many control blocks used in Contents Supervision that must be
changed. Then all the programs that inspect, manipulate, or format-dump those
control blocks must also be changed.
Bill Fairchild
Rocket Software
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
At 11:59 -0600 on 12/01/2010, Dana Mitchell wrote about Re: spool to
spool output transfer:
would take JES2 - JESA - JESB - JES2
Interesting puzzle. Seems to me that still wouldn't work, since JESA would
need to know about JES2 (left) because it's connected to it, and JES2
(right)
At 11:32 -0500 on 12/01/2010, August Carideo wrote about Re: OT: In
regard to password cracking Who is Abbie Sciuto :
Of course, it could be cracked by somebody like Abbie Sciuto (and
maybe the NSA or FBI) in just a few minutes grin.
Tim McGee also could do it. He is the major hacker on the
You have posted some novel and very confused ideas about the use of virtual
storage. First you thought that SAM64 forced interrupt disablement. Now you
have realized that dataspace storage is above the bar. This is also incorrect.
Virtual addresses in data spaces run from address 0 to
So could Chloe O'Brien.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 17:37, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com wrote:
At 11:32 -0500 on 12/01/2010, August Carideo wrote about Re: OT: In regard
to password cracking Who is Abbie Sciuto :
Of course, it could be cracked by somebody like Abbie Sciuto (and maybe
I've used * and ** in 3.4 for the dsname level.
From User's Guide II:
1. If you enter a high-level qualifier of ’*’ or ’**’, ISPF displays a
pop-up window
to warn you that the search will be for all catalogs on the system and will
take
time. If there are many catalogs, this search could take a
Only in conjunction with another DSN qualifier that is not just a ** or *.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Don Imbriale
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 3:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: best method to
Hmmm, what level are you running. Unless this changed in z/OS 1.12
(and I don't think it did), it isn't allowed.I get a pop up warning message:
In order to list catalog entries, you must specify at least one partial
qualifier. Any Dsname Level that contains only asterisks is
The quote from the manual came from 1.11. It may be as Barry has stated
that at least one qualifier must be specified that is not just * or **.
- Don Imbriale
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net wrote:
Hmmm, what level are you running. Unless this changed in z/OS
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
IIRC there is a field which has the timestamp of when the current step
started, but I cannot seem to find it.
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks
IIRC there is a field which has the timestamp of when the current step
started, but I cannot seem to find it.
ASCBINTS
--
This email might be from the
artist formerly known as CC
(or not) You be the judge.
--
For IBM-MAIN
ASCBINTS would be job start time, not current step.
Field TCBTCT points to the 'SMF Time Control Table'. Perhaps TCTAST or use the
pointer to step total SMF record (TCTT30S) and look at SMF30SIT.
Cheers, Ant.
Northern Territory Government of Australia
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Mark Zelden wrote:
3.4 doesn't allow * or **.
Try out *% (Asterisk followed by percentage sign without any spaces)
Warning: Your session will take a long time to process all those entries. (dead
entries, live entries, duplicate entries, and catalogs connected too.)
The CSI is a good option,
94 matches
Mail list logo
