-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of GAVIN Darren * OPS
EAS
Well I do have DLL programs using the Linkage parm I
mentioned before working with the Preprocessor and EXEC DLI
database calls. Have had no Issues doing this.
So as long as the CICS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
[ snip ]
Ideally, I would like to be able to set up a batch job that
can be run under scheduler control to transmit this file when
it is generated. If I am reading the correct information,
though,
Sorry; hit Send too soon
-Original Message-
From: Chase, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
[ snip ]
Ideally, I would like to be able to set up a batch job that
can be run
under scheduler control
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rugen, Len
Remember sftp is not equal to ftpssl.
Sorry; I ass.u.med the objective was only to accomplish an encrypted
file transfer via scheduled batch job, and didn't perceive sftp
specifically as a hard
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/23/2008
at 10:07 AM, Walt Farrell said:
One could argue that letting you determine your access to resources
without actually trying to use them (and thus
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Randy Evans
One could argue that letting you determine your access to
resources
without actually trying to use them (and thus without causing audit
records) is a form of hacking.
Perhaps, but some IBM code
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
One major difference. In CICS, the query security is for a
subset of RACF information, and is already running in the
proper environment, ie CICS, and is using the logged on
userid's ACEE. You
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Scott Ford
All,
Where dod I find the announcement letter for z/os v1.10 ??
http://preview.tinyurl.com/2su7lf
Note that it's a preview, not the announcement letter.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Arthur T.
On 27 Feb 2008 13:34:35 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
Tom.Schmidt wrote:
The z10 LSPR data is now available too.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/lspr/
Yes, and it looks like they
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Snipped
What the announcement actually says:
Snipped
So, as it says, the support planned in z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Relson
So as a curiosity question - if you can answer - is access to a zIIP
really
being controlled or is lack of knowledge preventing the masses from
rewriting
code so everyone buys as few GP engines as they
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 07:38:53 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
I believe that the information is being given out under a license
agreement at no or nominal charge (not positive about this).
It seems
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peggy Andrews
Hi, all.
Previously, in our 1.7 ServerPac order, we got Program
#5655D35, Java 2 Technology Edition - No charge Now, in
ShopzSeries for our 1.9 ServerPac order, it is showing an
available upgrade
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
sorry, I can't find the APAR II4094 on IBM web site
It's missing a digit -- try II14094.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Hi, All,
An application group is doing a stress test against a CICS region,
using batched instream commands via an IEFBR14 job to invoke a user
transaction. Some of the MODIFY commands are being rejected with
message IEE342I MODIFY REJECTED-TASK BUSY. The part of the
explanation in MC that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:02:25 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
Well, in the case of CICS, I was wrong. The manual states:
quote
If the task is to be attached, DFHZCNA obtains a TIOA and moves the
data
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul D'Angelo
The console handling In CICS is behaving as previously explained.
See the QEDIT Macro.
For CICS, Console Commands are handled by a component called
Terminal Control under the CSTP System Servives
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sorry, forgot to mention that I have been trying to get the system
progs to setup NJE but for some reason, they are reluctant to do so
Why?
and shared spool is definitely out of the question.
And,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
on 03/07/2008 at 11:25 AM, Chase, John said:
Question: Which is the task associated with the command in this
context:
The message is misleading; the task is the CSCB associated
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
JC writes
The QEDIT doc (z/OS 1.7 edition of the AAS manual) is
rather sparse,
and doesn't seem to address the rejected-task busy
situation.
You're being a bit generous there aren't you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
Schwarz, Barry A said:
Is CDT really 7 hours off from GMT?
CST is -0600. Fall back one hour and you get -0700.
Why would you fall back from CST? Wouldn't that give Daylight
Spending
Hi, All,
In preparation for z/OS 1.9 we're re-evaluating our paging subsystem
configurations. Currently we're using the same size and configuration
carried forward from time immemorial, mainly because it still works:
Three (3) page datasets of 2,000 cylinders each, with one in reserve
(available
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
[ snip ]
John,
Have you reviewed chapter 2 of the system initialization and
tuning guide?
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA
2E151/2.0?SHELF=IEA2BK80DT=20080119071214
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
John Mattson said:
Programmers have been deleting for years using BR14 (MOD,DELETE), and
IDCAMS DELETE.
IEFBR14 doesn't delete the data set. By the time IEFBR14 gets
control the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
[ snip ]
3. Migrate to z/OS 1.7 (and the latest middleware product
releases), which you can do with coexistence and fallback on
the same machine in new LPARs.
Is z/OS 1.7 even orderable at this
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
[ snip ]
Hmmm. When a data set is migrated, the VTOC entry is removed.
But, the catalog entry is still there (though the volume ID
is changed to MIGRAT).
Can't IDCAMS tell from the catalog
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Alford, Ben
Folks,
the spreadsheet I gave you is now stored on the shared vol2
disk, IBM_SYS in a folder called Assessment FY08.
You should be able to update it, as needed.
I'll wager this wasn't intended for
We are just about to start the migration from z/OS 1.7 to z/OS 1.9.
Would someone provide a ballpark percentage increase in the amount of
CPU resources between the two releases so we can estimate the monthly
increase in our z/OS base monthly billing?
TIA,
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
---snip
And modern day politicians found a cheap solution to energy
use that didn't work and cost a lot, but made it look as
though they were useful (not to mention
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Cheryl Walker
John,
Marianne Hammer of IBM gave an excellent SHARE presentation
that showed the changes between releases. Go to
www.share.org, click on Orlando Proceedings to the left, then
search for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Cheryl Walker
John,
Where are you getting the message. It certainly should be
available to the public, and many of my readers have recently
downloaded it. Here is a direct link -
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Eisenberg
Our programmers occasionally ZAP a load module in a test load
library, which is fine. When the time comes to promote the
load module into a production load library, however, I would
like our
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
[ snip ]
You promote load modules?!? shudder. We insist on a good
recompile from source.
We promote synchronized source / load packages. That way, we
guarantee that the code that goes into
Hi, All,
Can anybody explain this?
PAGE 0001 - NOW SET TO TARGET ZONE MVST100 DATE 03/18/08 TIME
14:21:00 SMP/E 34.06
SET BDY(MVST100).
GIM20501ISET PROCESSING IS COMPLETE. THE HIGHEST RETURN CODE WAS 00.
APPLY S(CEEWCO1) ASSEM REDO CHECK .
GIM54701S ** ALLOCATION
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is your MIGLIB APF authorized? APAR IR92833: MSGGIM54701S
Yes.
But you prompted me to look more closely at the JCL, which had MIGLIB
steplib'd to the other volume. Works fine now.
Thanks,
Hi, All,
We're renovating our page dataset allocations (z/OS 1.7 - 1.9) and
found that our previously-used DEFINE specs from many moons ago need
tweaking beyond space and volser; specifically, SWAP vs NOSWAP. From
reading the following:
SWAP|NOSWAP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Since this is a family list G I cannot use the true
language needed to
Express my opinion. I will have to paraphrase!
Horse Manure!
The phonetic alphabet is your friend here: Bravo Sierra, or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richard Bond
Predicators of the mainframe demise are probably of the same
genre as those experts (who have probably never opened a
science book) who are expounding the dangers of this global
warming nonsense.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Unless I previously missed it, I think this is the first time
volume 6 has been available.
Volume 6: Introduction to security, RACF(r) , Digital
certificates and PKI, Kerberos, cryptography and z990
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
[ snip ]
One outsourced their development to India because they
couldn't find any new COBOL programmers.
At a price they were willing to pay, perhaps
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Cyrus Goodriver wrote:
A question for IBMers who posted on this subject: Why the
nice feature
of informing PARM=* to PSP tool to screen all target zones
defined to
the Global CSI has been
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W.
You missed the point.
The previous post to mine mentioned that's it's easier to say
'Sorry' than get permission.
My post was meant to warn of the possible ramifications of
taking that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 28 Mar 2008 08:17:13 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman)
wrote:
Sounds like commentary I've heard about the U.S. legal system:
Truth
and justice are irrelevant, so long as procedure is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of willie bunter
Good Morning To All,
I am stuck trying to decipher the DEVTYPE X'' from
the following LISTCAT (posted below). The dsn is cataloged,
and the VOLSERS are controlled by a product
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Pace
Doing my first every install of CICS under z/OS. I'm
confused by some parameters in the dialog.
WUI - create a WUI CICSplex?
WUI?
Web User Interface.
This is a single z/OS system, there will not be
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
Ed,
Thanks for sending that link. That article raises a number
of questions. If you're the head of an agency and your z
machine is swamped, can you upgrade? I'm sure the process
takes at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
-snip-
I can promise you that if MVS will support email and surfing
the Internet you will have the same problem as open system have.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
-snip---
Damn! Here I thought I'd discovered a new super-secret,
undocumented,
instruction! Like the one that doesn't allow z/OS to run on an IFL
(yes, I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Chase, John wrote:
More likely the IFL has one or more instructions disabled, without
which z/OS simply won't IPL.
Rick is implying that the disabled instruction on specialty
engines
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote:
//SYSEXEC DD DISP=(OLD,PASS),DSN=amp;SYSEXEC
Trying the amp;, I get:
IEFC620I UNIDENTIFIABLE CHARACTER a ON THE DD STATEMENT
IEFC620I UNIDENTIFIABLE CHARACTER m
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
FUD ???
Shortened form of FUDSI: Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt, Superstition,
Ignorance. Like what we see in politics. :-(
-jc-
--
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
[ snip ]
Thanks for the information. I might ask my manager. But I
might not because the mainframe is going away. We don't
know when ...
Second Tuesday of next week is usually as good a prediction as
Hi, All,
How quickly does the first of a pair of SLIP IF traps arm the second
one?
I have a situation wherein I may need to trap an IF in a common routine
only when it's called from a specific location within a specific
program. The route from the caller to the common routine goes thru
some IBM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Scott Rowe
???
AFIAK there is no fix, microcode or otherwise, for the
segmentation offload problem. I think the default has since
been changed been changed to off. Also, it did not affect
old OSA cards, it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bobbie Justice
I've been logged on for several days, and it's been okay.
Worked for me, too.
I'd been signed-in via the web interface all day, and had received an
automatic notification of an update to an open
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:34:42 -0600, Howard Brazee wrote:
I pass by streets tape drive and disk drive next to Storage Tech
near Boulder, CO.
That would be circa:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on
04/10/2008
10:31:43 AM:
-- Information from the mail header
---
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Poster: Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Shane wrote:
Excellent !!! - did he say excellent ???.
Perhaps one day I'll bump into Mr. Jaffe in a bar somewhere
and coax
out of him who this mystical (mythical ???) vendor might be ... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Logan
I was wondering if there are any function debuggers on z/OS
these days.
Our shop is currently using z/OS 1.5, and the IBM provided LE
debugger (via the LE TEST options) is completely unusable for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 11:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of William H. Blair
Edward E Jaffe wrote:
I presume the reason is that an ICF engine has more moving parts and
precision components forged from precious metals -- requiring higher
manufacturing costs. These
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
[ snip ]
I forgot to mention that there is an IBM Debug Tool test
drive available, at least for the classic user interface. [I
posted details previously on the test drive for the graphical
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Or just assume '97' is a valid open (which it is) and continue.
Better choice!
Most shops have enough
Not just IBMLink, but also the z/OS Internet Library websites are
painfully slow responding today. Anybody else notice that, or might
it be local to the Chicago area?
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Savor, Tom
And I dislike application folks who won't test in my sandbox then
complain when
things blow up the first few days after a roll-up.
An impasse?
That was the point.
I understand that you guys
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Whelan
[ snip ]
The (in)famous CLC 0(R9,R8),FILTER'filter('found?
was actually based on one of the IRREVX01 samples included in
SYS1.SAMPLIB(RACEXITS):
LAR7,L'USERKEY
CLC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
roups.com
...
I moved some users high level nodes from a mastercat to a usercat.
All worked with one exception
This user can
Oops... Sorry for the blank reply...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
roups.com
...
I moved some users high level nodes from a mastercat to a usercat.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Skip Robinson
Dang, Patrick, how did I miss the connection? Once upon a
time, JES2 undertook to manage a newfangled print gismo the
same way they always had:
start, stop, ship data, handle glitches, the whole
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
We just upgraded our OS to ZOS 1.9 and old CoBOL programs
fail with the following error:
000121 008200 COPY ABEND01.
000121== IGYDS0010-S A COPY statement was found
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Michael Cleary
Greetings,
I am posting this to try and find the long list of future
SHARE conferences for the next few years.
In looking at SHARE's web site, under future conferences,
only San Jose and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Johnson
Can anyone recommend a mainframe product to monitor MQ
series. We use ASG's TMON's for CICS, DB2, and zOS. I assume
they also have an MQ monitor?
We run TMON/MQ, but since I'm not the MQ Guy I can't
Hi, All,
In preparation for z/OS 1.9 (currently on 1.7), we're fledging the
tn3270 server from the TCPIP nest to its own address space. TCPIP
currently runs in SYSSTC. Would that also be appropriate for the new
TN3270 address space? Any difference in importance or specific goals
for it?
We're
Um, there's no H in DFSORT..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George, William (DHCS-ITSD)
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 2:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Identify matching records
Thanks, I did go
Append the part that wrapped to the second line.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George, William (DHCS-ITSD)
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 2:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Identify matching records
I get
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 21:56 -0500, Al Sherkow wrote:
Contact your independent consultant for an independent analysis of
which of the alternatives is best for your site.
And if you don't happen to have
Forwarded on behalf of a colleague
__
We ordered a z/OS 1.9 ServerPac on 3592 media. IBM shipped the
cartridge without a bar code.
We are using a 3584 Automatic Tape Library which requires an external
bar code label.
We tried the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
It seems RIM is screwing up BlackBerry usage, again.
So, I am sending this (off-topic) message just to see what
the replyto is.
Sorry, if I bother you.
I received it with reply-to set to IBM-MAIN.
Hi All,
Is anybody else having problems submitting SCRT reports via the LMS
website this morning? We _think_ we submitted ours, but have not
received any response yet (it's been 3 hours so far).
Earlier we had received notification of a scheduled outage for Sunday,
May 4, but .
TIA,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
Yes it's great if you are allowed to connect your system to
the internet. For the rest (few?) of us who cannot, we still
need maintenance.
And while we are on the subject, why does an internet
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
My adventure with ShopzSeries:
I ordered JAVA SDK for z/OS. It is free product/ I can
dowlnload it from IBM webpage without any paperwork. However
web-downloadable form is non-SMP/E. SMP/E package is only
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jousma, David
All of you are starting to show your age Something you
setup once, and forget.
Indeed. If you don't occasionally learn some new tricks, your
audience will get bored and wander off...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
Strange, I could have sworn you were one of the vocal
dissenters when IBM did away with JOBCAT and STEPCAT. Not
all progress is in the forward direction.
I think that was Ed Gould
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
Well, if ya'll remember, we've had a spate of COBOL File
Status codes of
97 since we split our z/OS image in two. This occurs when the
file is open for OUTPUT on one image and a COBOL program
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 4:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion ListOn Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Aside from the fact that you might be improving their code :)
I thought you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
I'm pretty sure Ditto is only shipped with z/OS if you pay for it.
I believe it's called File Manager nowadays, and it is a priced product.
We demo'd Version 1.0 way back when, and at the time it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ken Porowski
IBM* DITTO/ESA for OS/390 or MVS Version 1 Release 3
Is what I have.
I've been ordering it with my ServerPac's for every z/OS
release I've had.
Not really changed since the ESA days (as you can
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
I'm working on reporting tools for RACF and could use a
little help in determining sizes. I need to work with
in-storage tables, or possibly linked lists, to associate
various items of data. Could
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Chase, John wrote:
For those interested in responding, here's a quick'n'dirty
way to get
those
counts:
[ ... snipped ... ]
The counts will show in the ICE227I messages in //SYSOUT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jerry Fuchs
By doing a GOOGLE search on IOEPRM00 came up with a red book
on zFS implementation.
Since he didn't, I will:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246580.pdf
-jc-
Is it just me, or is IBM's public doc server dragging its ahem
today?
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mariuca Iftime
It is no PTF available for ZOS 1.9, only ZOS 1.4
PTF List:
Release 740 : UA40682 available 08/05/07 (1000 ) == 1.9
Release 750 : PTF not available yet == 1.10
Release 750 :
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 11 May 2008 14:26:06 -0700, David Alcock wrote:
Ever since the Web came along I've been annoyed by
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
[ snip ] Also, it annoys me that (I have done this on occasion)
the sites don't validate the combination of state and zip
code. Especially since the drop-downs aren't always in the
same order,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
[ snip ]
I did work for a company that had to clean up addresses - it
had a dirty word file that it used - but I've read of some
foreign dirty
words that are valid places and names. . . .
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
At 11:27 -0500 on 05/12/2008, Chase, John wrote about Re:
Mainframe programming vs the Web:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Klein
This note was posted directly to the USENET newsgroup and
hasn't had many replies. I am forwarding it to the
list-server, to see if more people have input on it. (It is
also in the comp.lang.cobol
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 13 May 2008 08:57:14 -0700, Michael Poil wrote:
Give me Assembler and a hand-held uninterpreted
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jousma, David
BTW, in either 1.7 or 1.8 LE parms got moved to PARMLIB, CEEPRMxx
At 1.7 it became an option. Don't know yet if 1.9 does away with the
USERMOD; we'll find out in about a week or so.
-jc-
1 - 100 of 2492 matches
Mail list logo
