We need a report of total bytes on tape.
Is there an RMM report that will include the byte usage?
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
I set up the job and I'm getting an error-
No extended extract record found in the extended extract file.
I'm using the extract file that we create daily.
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Thanks Greg.
I set up the job and I'm getting an error-
No extended extract record found in the extended extract file.
I'm using the extract file that we create daily. Any ideas?
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Thanks.
I tried running EDGHSKP to create the extract (JCL below) but get
EDG6207E DFSMSrmm SUBSYSTEM UNABLE TO ALLOCATE AND OPEN THE INPUT AND OUTPUT DAT
Thanks for any help as I'm new to RMM.
Elaine
//JSTP0020 EXEC PGM=EDGHSKP,
// PARM='RPTEXT,DATEFORM(J)'
//MESSAGE DD
I have made changes to the EDT so need to hard activate the new IODF on my
first test system.
After I do this the IODF will be out of sync on my other LPARs.
Can I still do a soft activate on the out of sync LPARs? (I didn't think you
could when the tokens were out of sync)
But I've heard of
I'm rolling out IODF changes dynamically, all SOFT and HARD on the final LPAR.
Our change management rules have gotten more stringent and I need to define a
reversion plan.
If on say, the third LPAR something goes awry and we need to back out,
are there options besides
1) POR or
2) continue
Thanks for the responses.
Of course our change process will not allow saying it's never happened before
as justification for not having a reversion plan.
I always do a TEST before activations
I've debated HARD first or SOFT first but doing HARD first is really contrary
to our change procedures-
I'm working with Larry. We tried removing the JTIP mods but basically gave up.
There are a lot of old mods on our system and we had to keep backing them off
and could never get JES working.
We actually got the maintenance (RSU1501) applied and the only thing that
doesn't work is SYSAFF
Any
Thanks all!
It was including the NOEXPIRED keyword that fixed our problem.
We were getting no error messages and the id is not used for TSO
When we changed it with TSO the batch FTPs still failed.
Thanks again.
Elaine
--
For
We have a non-expiring password that we've used for years and somehow failed
the other night. I reset with an alu line command but the new password doesn't
work. When I go through the panels it says the current password isn't valid.
We have changed password rules but I don't see where that
I've found a lot of " it's " confusing comments on this topic and I am
beleaguered-
I am trying to copy a file to an existing, pre-allocated new name.
Seems that should be pretty straight forward... but having to specify rename to
make a copy is anything but straight forward
I'm getting ADR380E
These LPARs do share a master catalog.
LOADxx syscat has the same parm on both LPARs
A listcat of the master shows the alias entry
ALIAS -,SYS7.R30
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
LPARA SYSCAT SCS001123CCATALOG.ICF.VSCS001 VCATICF
LPARB SYSCAT SCS001123CCATALOG.ICF.VSCS001 VCATICF
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Good point but I checked and Include Additional Qualifiers is selected.
Also, in addition to my ne wdataset, there is one older one that has the same
issue.
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I have a 2 LPAR sysplex and a shared user catalog
the catalog has only 2 alias entries
when I allocate a new dsn (iefbr14) on one of the LPARs, say LPARA, listcat's
look as expected
but on the other LPARB listcat up to some level of qualifiers the dataset is
not listed
alias sys7.r30
listcat
Thanks Lizette.
I have verified with 3.4 and listcat - same results
there are other datasets in the catalog that list on both LPARs
and F CATALOG confirms it's allocated on bot LPARs
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Thanks all- done!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hi John,
I used the JCL I have used for years. I thought STGR is the key.
//JS10EXEC PGM=ICKDSF,PARM='NOREPLYU'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
INIT UNIT(9836) VERIFY(SSS052) VOLID(SSS052) -
VTOC(0,1,149) INDEX(10,0,45) STGR
Thanks,
Elaine
I have initialed a volume as STRG and it is offline.
I added it to an SMS storage group via ISMF
The volume now shows up in the ISMSF storage group.
However, when I vary the volume online the status does not show as SMS.
What am I missing?
Thanks,
Elaine
Thanks for the responses.
I thought the translate/validate/activate was only for ACS routine updates
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
I'm copying disk to disk.
source file is 2 volumes and I want to copy (expand) to pre-allocated,
catalogued 3 volume file.
I modified the OUTDDNAME(DASD2) to include all 3 (new) volumes.
The issue (now) is that the copy is trying to use the original STORCLAS but the
new file is a different
Robert,
Thank you- duh, read the whole error message:(
I was looking at only the first xxx reason code.
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
I need to generate a listcat with only the dsn. like in 3.4 but I want it in a
dataset with ONLY the dsn.
TSO SAVE and IDCAMS produce additional lines.
Any recommendations?
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Thanks all for the options.
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Update- there're are actually two errors.
the one that actually says out of space
451-System completion code and reason: B37-04
451-Data set is out of space.
451 Transfer aborted due to file error.
and I found that the FTP does submit a job with the primary specified
but cannot get it even
This is an FTP with I guess dynamic allocation (dataset does not exist)
There are multiple volumes with available space when requested.
The error is
550-SVC99 RETURN CODE=4 S99INFO=0 S99ERROR=38668 HEX=970C S99ERSN code
X'012C'.
550 Unable to create data set OY72364.APTAR.L1.AIBILL.EXT
sorry, I should have mentioned. applying RSU
SET BOUNDARY (MVST100) .
APPLY
SELECT(UA93140 UA78422 UA83116 UA92976)
GROUPEXTEND
BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)
CHECK
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
sorry wrong job, previous one was trying to do some of the individual PTFs
having an issue
SET BOUNDARY (MVST100) .
APPLY
SOURCEID(RSU*)
GROUPEXTEND
BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)
CHECK
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
I am running an apply check and get messages because PTFs required as co or
pre-req are already applied.
do I have to individually exclude these ptf's? It looks like aypassapplycheck
is good only on accept.
Thanks,
Elaine
--
Gil-
I have tried both ways.
originally
SET BOUNDARY (MVST100) .
APPLY
SOURCEID(RSU*)
GROUPEXTEND
BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)
CHECK
then I tried SELECTing PTFS with the same issue.
which makes sense, if they're applied, they're applied:)
Elaine
we have 3 sets of sysres volumes we rotate through
unfortunately our sys1.root.hfs is indirectly catalogued to one of the sysres
volumes (don't shoot the messenger)
I can't allocate a new uncatalogued root because it is in use.
I could copy to a new name but of course not desirable and it's
We have a 3 sets of sysre(s) we rotate through with maintenance and root is on
one of them (don't shoot the messenger)
I am trying to copy root to the next set using the same root name.
When I do a full volume copy with FDR and DSS, root utilization in 3.4 is blank.
this is true for all 3 of
Thanks Carmen.
For some reason I do not find these posts when I search. only got it this time
because I caught it in most few recent posts.
I will try the mount, seems that would alleviate concerns.
I do have plans to take it off the sysres and convert to zsf.
'//EDIOUT2 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//DDIN DD DSN=file1,DISP=(OLD,DELETE,KEEP)
//DDOUT1 DD DSN=file2,
// DISP=(,CATLG),MGMTCLAS=MC60DY,
// LIKE=file1
//SYSINDD DISP=SHR,DSN=PROCLIB(AIBACKC1) --> sysin is just reporo in to
out
//*
When these abend with a
Thanks for the help!
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
We have a job that is coded as follows-
step1 - idcams repro dummy in to file1,disp=(mod,catalg)
step2 repro above (dummied) file1 , disp=(old,delete,keep)
to file2 disp=(,catlg)
when we get a B37 on step2 file2, file1 is deleted even though it has
disp=(old,delete,keep)
I've scoured the
We are getting this message even though there is a LOT of contiguous space
available in the storage group.
We get this periodically and adding a volume seems to relieve the immediate
request.
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN
I see you said a new allocation so of course I can't migrate it.
there are many volumes available in the storage group.
it doesn't request multiple volumes..
why does it not search the group until it gets the requested space?
Elaine
Thanks Mike.
This is a new allocation and there are many volumes it could extend to.
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Yes, I would IPL with a different loadparm to point to COUPLExx with DR XCF and
CFRM
but WLM and LOGR would not change (use same ones as in current environment)
In falling back, I would use the same current (not DR) XCF/CFRM/WLM/LOGR
so I would use the same LOGR and WLM for DR and 'prod'
no
So, both systems down
IPL LPAR1 with new XCF and CFRM, use existing LOG and WLM files
Will that cause an issue falling back?
by using the same LOG and WLM files?
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
We are planning to test a remote copy sysplex environment and I would like to
test it in our home DEV environment
PROD data will not be accessible during the DR test so PROD sysplex should not
be affected
To test in DEV I have defined a new XCF and CFRM since I will need to do that
for DR
to
Kees, thank you. I see that would not work and it would be better to have both
systems down and IPL one at a time.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Thanks all.
We were able to issue the start policy for the DR policy and all went well!
till we got to the network :)
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Unless we're picking up the wrong COUPLE member, the CFRM and XCF
are pointing to the DR datasets
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
To expand on this...
yes, we are just getting to the DR test:)
I have new XCF and CFRM datasets pointing to new plant id and serial number,
policy
but no new LOGR and WLM, using same as prod (on another machine)
defined a new policy in DR CFRM
We IPLd at the other site for DR and got the
Thank you.
I believe you may have hit on our issue.
We're getting the in use for the LOGR which is not new and I am okay with that.
I'm confident we're picking up the DR COUPLExx but we've never had the POLICY
statement.
We were planning on issuing the SETXCF START with the new policy name.
The
Thanks.
I can't start 2.2 (so can't enter the $DACTIVATE) and on my 1.13 system
it's 40 cyls, 90% free so presumably CFSIZER would say that's enough.
I can double or triple it no problem but I find it a little strange that 2.2
needs
over 90% of my current allocation when JOBS/JOES/BERTS etc
We are migrating from 1.13 to 2.2 in a MAS sysplex.
JES2 WARM start, no parm changes.
Checkpoint in z11 mode.
Of course I'm trying to get around having to define a separate JES on 2.2 LPAR
A cold start is a possibility. Right now that's the only possible 'fix' that I
see
When I IPL the first
Allan,
Thank you.
How would I know how large to make it, leaving a reasonable amount of free
space?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Is there a way to see total central storage on a z13 HMC?
I can see it by selecting individual LPARs but am interested in an overall view.
I have 11 LPARs, 9 deactivated, I have activated and IPLd several of the 6GB
defined LPARs multiple times earlier this year.
All 9 deactivated again I'm
Isn't there a way to recall previous commands on the console?
I can't find anything and it's killin me!
Thanks, Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
so, when I do a D PFK, it doesn't give an option to set a PA1 key.
the only PA1 key I have defined is for my 3270 session, the console access is
via VNC
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
thanks. so how do I define the MVS PA1-PA3 keys to the console?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
so I don't know where my PA1 key is except in my TN3270 session keyboard
what is it when I'm on the console?
I can display and change the PFkeys but don't know what the PA1 key is.
and as expected, the TN3270 key doesn't work on the console
Well that didn't take long... the dreaded comma...
Thanks much!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Paul,
Thank you. At one point I had gotten in to the system completion codes, not
wait states.
That could have sent me down the rabbit hole :)
I had checked my page dsn's, this is DR and they are replicated. However, we
never get any messages
on the console. I will check the config for the page
Gil, thanks.
I do get that message but when I do a listcat, the mastcat and usercat look
correct.
They look the same as other previously defined users.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
so now I've got a lead on our good friend SMS :(
which of course hasn't changed in 2 years.
looks like maybe storclas isn't being defined
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
so...
I have looked at every dsn in the logon proc SYSPROC and SYSEXEC
i found two places where the 'offending' dataset is being allocated new,
including the one that issues the error messages
I inserted a CONTROL LIST CONLIST SYMLIST MSG
and a listcat and I see no output when logging on to the
aarrgghh. sorry about that one too. RACF profiles are created correctly
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I give up :), asking for help
Defining a new user and logon proc issues
SET =
ALLOC FI(ISPPROF) SHR DA('')
the dsn is new and evidently the alloc fails
but i can manually alloc a new dsn without the new parm (under another ID)
if I try a manual allocate with the failing ID (and no
sorry, yes, there is an alias defined
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Any recommendations for CA1, CA Workload Automation (JSS/ESP), TPX session
manager replacements?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
I want to mark up a screen print and am wanting a way to mark squares, arrows,
etc.
i use snippet but see only a free form line to use
I use Word borders but they don't work with an object
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN
for future reference the ISPF panel showed IEFPROC but the logon panel
showed another name
in other words the logon proc member name was different than the proc name
the 'failing' proc has the same name as the member name
--
nm :)
I found another path
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I give up :)
I have two logon procs,
on LPAR1, logon proc A works as desired
the thing is, I can't find it
I've looked in all of the JES2 PROCLIBs
is there anything special about logon proc IEFPROC?
I see the DD name in a lot of procs in the proclib but no proc named IEFPROC
this is the one
aha. I will take this offline but for clarity-I had noticed recently
that we do not have a sysplex root...
Thanks David
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Of course I'm missing something...
If I'm getting contention on the USER.HFS (because it's shared in the sysplex)
why does it matter what directory it's in?
/u or /home it's still the same file
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
I should have clarified,
we do have sysplex /etc, /var and /log.
have no idea why it was set up that way all those years ago
I can see that if I created a sysplex /home things will be well :)
thanks for the help
--
For IBM-MAIN
I have a question about user HFS in a sysplex
LPARs are sysplex'd but not OMVS SYSPLEX(NO)
Migrating 1.13 to 2.2
LPAR1 - 1.13
LPAR2 - 2.2
separate root
so, /u/userid.USER.HFS is off root but there is only one userid.USER.HFS so
it's getting shared
and will only allocate on one system
do I
Thanks Carmen
I do see we have auto mnt defined on other systems.
but I don't see it in BPXPRMxx
also, it still doesn't show me other users directories. is that by design?
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
wow does that make sense! thanks!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
IBM would not respond because these are usage questions
My root files system are mounted READ as is recommended
I have superuser(0)
I have a /u/(userid) directory on some systems but not others.
I've been here awhile and haven't had the reason to use OMVS but am finding now
I do
all of this
Thanks Tom!
Evidently I lost that somewhere along the way
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On July 19, 2019 I posted an issue for an Alias Listcat discrepancy betweeen
sysplex'd LPARs.
Two LPARs, 3.4 listcat showed results on one LPAR and not the other.
Issue was never resolved, I just lived with it.
Now, I listcat 3.4 and get no results on either LPAR
can't live with that :)
not sure
We have a dev sysplex both in ECS mode
My 2.2 ServerPac catalog which has been around awhile shows Inact(NotShrable)
and I cannot access datasets, even 3.4 from either sysplex.
By definition, I shouldn't be able to-
Listcat shows
master catalog - USERCATALOG --- CATALOG.ICF.VSMP301
78 matches
Mail list logo