Personally I'd use the DFSORT Symbols mappings:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/mvs/symbols/dcol14.zip
And that ought to make it easier, including avoiding the RDW issue.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence
Well, Batch LSR Subsystem(BLSR) started out as a sample of how to write a
subsystem, IIRC. I think it was in a WSC orange book.
But I don't know how to locate it now. Anyone?
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
Good luck with a DTD that covers the panoply of SMF record types and
subtypes. :-)
Might well prefer JSON myself (hip that I ain't) :-) - but similar issues
arise with that.
Martin (not speaking for SMF or any other Development) Packer
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator
s/300J/600J/ :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs
I'd say generation of XML was pretty cheap. It's the parsing that's
expensive.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog
Excellent! But it seems to be behind SHARE's paywall. I don't really
object to that - but it WILL limit your audience. :-(
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
for an IPL before we have to make changes. (I'm
not 100% certain we absolutely can't.)
The narrow question is whether BLSR is a Dynamic Subsystem or not. Wider
answers accepted, of course.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
Thanks! I'd already read the book and noted that Dynamic SSI came after
BLSR. And so the BLSR book might not have been updated.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
WAS runs servlets and its kin - server side java. Applets are client-side
java (and largely giggled at*). :-)
* Actually cursed at on occasion in my case as our expenses system relies
on them. :-)
Glad the OP sorted out his problem.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
CA Reclaim is the one item I can think of.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
.CSV won't contain formulae. Don't know if that's what bothers the OP -
but it bothers ME as I'd like to generate them in REXX.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Turns out Gnumeric will treat the formulae right but Symphony won't. But
exporting to ODS format from Gnumeric and opening in Symphony preserves
the formulae.
(And, yes, Symphony's Help claims it would do the right thing.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
I think the IP stands for Internal Plumbing. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
I'd always recommend RMF Coupling Facility Activity report (and SMF 74-4)
and RMF XCF report (and SMF 74-2). I can't comment on how you might
process the SMF records but there are several choices.
I assume you have RMF (or the functional equivalent).
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
I suspect XML parsing with zAAP-on-zIIP in effect. Do you have zAAPs
because that would rule this out.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
As this started off on CICS-L I assumed the context of the question was
CICS potential usages. Hence my stab at XML - as the only one I can think
of.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email
, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Mike Wood mww
(typically QWAC).
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
And the cross-platform Calibre does nicely - for laptops/desktops. I use
it on both OSX and Linux. (In fact I use Calibre to convert EPUB to MOBI
for my Kindle occasionally.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
And adopt probably should be adapt.
Oh no! I scored an own goal. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
Why can't you vary it offline with automation? Most customers I know have
offline CPs - usually to get the total of online and offline up to or
above the number of physical CPs in the pool.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
In a nutshell CFLEVEL 18 and OA37826 can tell you about this.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
are less leery of User-Managed Structure Duplexing
than System-Managed.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
Glad it worked out for you. What was the diagnostic that told you this?
IEHIBALL? :-) Or the message that was suggested? Or something else?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
advantage of it if present - but they'll have to
speak for themselves. I seem to recall their logic was that setting up for
a zIIP isn't free so it's worth not trying if it's going to end up on a
GCP.
(And thanks to Tim for reinforcing my point.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal
R742JOBM might give you a clue - in RMF XCF Activity data.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
Me dummy :-) it's R742MJOB
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
Doing that would make the JCL poor (or apparently contradictory)
documentation. So I would hope the disagreement would be flagged somehow.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
What do we suppose the intended use cases were for this?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Clark
To my mind quad made more sense than tri. But as others have said the game
moved on.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog
You really want DBM1 / MSTR in a service class above CICS e.g. Vel 80 and
Importance 1.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Velocity of 80 is not a recipe. It depends on what is typically achieved.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
this, but really it's DBM1's
access to zIIP CPU that matters most.
It's an open secret :-) that I'm working on a zIIP Capacity Planning
presentation for delivery early in the new year. I think there'll be quite
a market for such a presentation. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
If you want a link between REXX and SMF it is that in z/OS 2.1 REXX can
process VBS eg SMF directly.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
A reasonable question might be do you expect installations to need this
data to grow? If so and the growth is enough it might well be
ARCHITECTURALLY better to move to 64 bit at some point.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
.
And at the risk of annoying people with blatant self promotion :-) see:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/MartinPacker/entry/ziip_address_space_instrumentation?lang=en
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44
presentation. Largely because I
don't want people fiddling with it.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
One key advantage of not going the pretend it's VB route - which you can
now do in 2.1 - is you don't stand to break records. For example SMF 30
and SMF 42-6. These are not the kind of records I want to break. :-)
(And thanks for the mention.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
It's SMF 64 which gives you a clue as to what actually HAPPENED - with
Read, Update, Insert and Delete counters, plus the CI / CA Split counts,
level changes etc. No 62. 64 is CLOSE, 62 is OPEN.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
party to that.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From a modern perspective the single-level store in FS would've meant at
least 128-bit addressing, perhaps 256, by now. And there'd be consequences
to that. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245
There are (31-bit and, more relevantly perhaps, 24-bit) virtual storage
numbers in SMF 30 that might help you. But if you are failing to get
enough storage maybe they wouldn't.
I'm thinking of Step-End - Subtype 4 - records.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
Worried about your terminology here. Please show us the report.
In most interpretations of what you said about the 6796K number it looks
like a very small 24-Bit Private is available to you.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
Wonder what happens if you manage region to goals of BOTH. Anyone using
that yet? Note: SMF30PF2 has a new(ish) bit for it.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
One thing worth considering - and having read the relevant bits in the
manual and not seeing it there - is the suggestion I've heard that
sometimes the IMS Control Region would benefit from Both.
Horst, care to elaborate on that?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
DB2, IMS and CICS have already done considerable work moving stuff from
31- to 64-Bit, to name just three products.
Certainly in the case of DB2 it was vital. For CICS becoming more so.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
I thought s stood for standard rather than spanned. It's the s in
VBS that's spanned.
But I can't answer your question. :-(
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Open and close square bracket, I expect.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
in REXX stem variables...)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs
+1 for taking a look at the language - in case its party tricks are
compelling. But I wonder how many packages are written in Lua - and that's
my real beef.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
If this were an Open Source project I might be able to persuade my
employer to allow me to work on it. Or at least to use it.
So, is it?
If not I have to wish you well and decline to play. :-(
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
If that's true in Another World I wonder what it'd take to make it true in
THIS one.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog
Might be a silly question but do we have to use THEIR build system? In its
entirety?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog
- such as finding
things in listings.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks
Thank you... That's ANOTHER thing I'll have to play with (and blog about)
when on my residency in October - as I'll have my first sight of a 2.1
system then. I wonder if we'll get to write the Redbook. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide
I'm showing my ignorance here - but maybe it's a better class of ignorance
:-) ...
Why \2 and not \1? I recognise this as a backreference but don't know
what happened to the first one.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
It was both but John's answered the question.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
Compiling matters if you do it lots of time. Just a few - as in some
situational apps - and it won't matter much.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
.
A concordance of SMF record mappings would be great, but detail would need
to be added to the current field descriptions. A large task, I'd say.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
Then that would either be April 1988 or December 1988, depending on
whether DFP 3.1 shipped with MVS/ESA 3.1.0 or 3.1.0e.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
5 minutes is a new one on me. 2 secs, 10 secs are common WLM intervals.
15 mins is common for RMF but I *have* seen 5 mins for RMF where the
installation sets it that way.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44
Yes, that would be a Release 13 thing. And yes my October residency will
explore some of the value of this and, particularly, the 2.1 enhancements
- for job cloning.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802
Maybe rhetorical question:
Is sending notices from JES2 via SMS as secure as you need?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Doesn't SMF 14 / 15 help you here? Probably 15 as it's SORTWK etc. The
problem will be identifying the actual sort work DD statement names. Maybe
30 can also do it - assuming it marks a DD as tape.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking
That's true - but they're different. Not knowing them well enough I can't
say but there might be an indicator that says tape sort work in them.
By default they're SMF 208 (and most customers don't change them). I'm
sure MXG has them taped. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
I think it's tape sort WORK data sets that aren't supported - judging by
others' contributions to this thread.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
Yes, and I've no idea now whether the OP is JES2 or JES3.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
the anchor for something? Common Large Memory Objects
perhaps?
And are YOU seeing large memory numbers?
I ask because I've seen it again in a customer with z/OS R.11.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245
Thank you. Care to name a few - not to point the finger, but so I have
some idea what they are?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
number. Or
whatever the truth turns out to be.
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
I think you meant UK. :-) And as pissed and pissed off are movable
UKUS feasts :-) here goes...
Think urinals. :-)
You asked for it. :-) So here's some toilet humour. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44
And I think COBDFSYM has promise: Provides a way to map records based on
COBOL Copybook for DFSORT.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
- whether as
a sample or as product function - were created.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
It's possible the OP meant to ask how do I use a batch job to install a
WLM service definition / activate a policy. Perhaps they could clarify.
No, I don't know how to do this.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
Interesting: JFCB appears in its entirety in SMF 14 and 15: I extract
things like member name from it in my code.
I'm wondering how to get the LBI Blksize from SMF 14 / 15. Maybe I can't.
If I figure it out I'll try to write it up (or point to any existing write
up).
Cheers, Martin
Martin
Thanks Yifat! That should be particularly easy to extract.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
Actually more slower engines applies here as well.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
I think a useful stretch objective would be to get the information into
the load module in some vaguely architected header.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: John McKown
First thing to do is check what the result of INREC looks like. Second is
to consider ICETOOL DATASORT to avoid sorting the header / trailer (or
else use OUTFIL to recreate them.
Cheers, Martin
From: Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh
vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com
To:
You ought to be able to do the +1 in DFSORT, by the way. In case that
changes the problem into a better one. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
Can you show us a sample of input data and of data before it's sorted i.e
after the INREC?
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
It's probable DFSORT could do that too. Consider the value of IFTHEN and
ADD,+1 in OUTREC to increment and check the bounds of the block haven't
been reached.
But I accept that might be a fetishistic approach: Turning everything into
something to be solved by DFSORT.
Cheers, Martin
Martin
But if everybody upped and grabbed all 2GB and touched each page... :-(
:-)
Which is why I recommend a good regime in place. I haven't yet said what
that regime would be nor how to code it. Perhaps I should. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator
for almost 30
years. Others likewise and some even longer.
However what we have here is a discussion that has little structure now.
:-(
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
BTW SMF 30 also has the limit and how obtained in it. So you can see what
an individual job / address space can get at and why.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Except 1MB (and a fortiori 2GB) page frames were designed to do something
else: Give better TLB effectiveness - fewer entries to cover the same
amount of memory.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245
code - with the
release-specific MEMLIMIT minima hardcoded. I already report Usage section
data in a separate report and MEMLIMIT/reason for jobs and steps when I
study them.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
I think the term pointer compression is relevant here - to java heap
just above 2GB.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog
VIO has, in any case, been seen as CPU expensive. Because it's simulating
a device. I would, however, quite like to see VIO in Memory reborn - with
a huge (EAV) device type.
Full(er) disclosure: I wrote a presentation on managing VIO with DFSMS
back in 1988.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
trying to be helpful.
But I appreciate you haven't defined your problem properly or you're
asking the wrong question can be offputting. Sorry about that and I'm
not sure how to make it better.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
I don't disagree: I didn't really talk implementation but I want to see
very large temp data sets in memory, controlled via DFSMS and not too
expensive. First step is very large IMHO but recast to be cheaper in CPU
terms at the same time would be welcome.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
That's because we haven't ANNOUNCED anything. :-) TGIF :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
Without meaning to be defensive z196 a flop? I've encountered tons of
them.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
Personally I prefer data set but comprehend dataset. A bit like Full
Function English and Limited Function English. :-)
Lights blue touch paper but fails to stand well back. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
I always thought file went with DD and data set with physical object.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
forwards.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From
I thought CICS switched to using standard Program Fetch 25 years ago.
Old V3? Does knowing that change anything?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
Are they not BDAM? I think that's how they showed up in our SMF-based
reporting, but it's been a long time since I saw any.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
1 - 100 of 658 matches
Mail list logo