iginal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
STORCLAS(desired storclas) BYPASSACS(**)
-Original Message-
Fro
BYPASSACS(**) -
STORCLAS(x) -
ADMINISTRATOR -
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
[External Email]
I'm copying disk to disk
Storageclass ACS routine error, or the storage administrator deleted the STDSTS
STORCLAS from the active SMS environment?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original
STORCLAS(desired storclas) BYPASSACS(**)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 11:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
I'm copying disk to disk.
source file is 2 volumes
I'm copying disk to disk.
source file is 2 volumes and I want to copy (expand) to pre-allocated,
catalogued 3 volume file.
I modified the OUTDDNAME(DASD2) to include all 3 (new) volumes.
The issue (now) is that the copy is trying to use the original STORCLAS but the
new file is a different
Robert,
Thank you- duh, read the whole error message:(
I was looking at only the first xxx reason code.
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Hi Elaine,
Assuming you are getting a ADR380E reason code 75, the message is saying
that sys7.r30.v22.root.hfs resides on more volumes than just the volume
pointed to by DASD1. It was mentioned by a couple people already to
specify SELECTMULTI(ANY), that should do the trick for you. If not,
On 2019-05-17, at 07:58:45, Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services) wrote:
> Assuming we're talking copying to disk (I'm not sure you could copy a dataset
> to tape, never tried),
> but ZFS's, being VSAM, must be cataloged; you couldn't thus copy a ZFS to two
> different volumes
> with the same
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Allan Staller
Sent: 17 May 2019 14:18
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
-- This email has reached the Bank via an external source --
Presuming this is an HFS, (and based
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
I don't know for sure if OUTDD works exactly like OUTDY; I was wondering. I
used (no longer a DSS shop) OUTDY to list candidate volumes; COPY makes only
one copy, whether it exists on one volume or is spread across multiple ones.
Anyway, since
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jackson, Rob
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 7:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
I don't know for sure if OUTDD works exactly like OUTDY; I was wondering. I
used (no longer
Try added SELECTMULTI(ANY)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jackson, Rob
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 7:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
I don't know for sure
volume--assuming
it's really HFS. I guess the same restriction would apply to ZFS.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 7:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
[External
Please post the full message. That 001 is not the reason code; that should be
right after 'NOT PROCESSED'. If the reason code were actually 1, for an
un-moveable dataset, I'd say add FORCE.
You could also just delete the target.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
So you are making 3 copies on 3 different OUTDDNAMES?
If it is one dataset on 3 volumes it would be one OUTDDNAME, right?
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 4:51 PM Elaine Beal wrote:
>
> I've found a lot of " it's " confusing comments on this topic and I am
> beleaguered-
> I am trying to copy a file to
Same names on a rename
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 5:51 PM Elaine Beal wrote:
> I've found a lot of " it's " confusing comments on this topic and I am
> beleaguered-
> I am trying to copy a file to an existing, pre-allocated new name.
> Seems that should be pretty straight forward... but having
16 matches
Mail list logo