Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Steve Smith
Oh please... you have a Shopsmith , not a hammer. :-) sas On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Sri h Kolusu wrote: > >> It seems ironic that Sri didn't suggest using ICEGENER instead of > IDCAMS. For 5M+ records, I sure think I'd give it a try. > > Steve, > > I could sug

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Sri h Kolusu
>> It seems ironic that Sri didn't suggest using ICEGENER instead of IDCAMS. For 5M+ records, I sure think I'd give it a try. Steve, I could suggest using DFSORT/ICEGENER/ICETOOL to most of the data manipulating questions posted here but then it would be like having a hammer, that makes everythin

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Frank Swarbrick
The fix for APAR OA54007 was just implemented on our system and has resolved the issue. Great!! From: Frank Swarbrick Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:51 AM To: ibm-main@listserv.ua.edu Subject: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 We just upgraded from z/OS 2.2 to

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Steve Smith
ICEGENER (& DFSORT in general) yes; IEBGENER, haven't tried it, but I'd be fairly gobsmacked if it did. sas On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Frank Swarbrick < frank.swarbr...@outlook.com> wrote: > ICEGENER works for VSAM files? Does IEBGENER? I thought it did not.

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Frank Swarbrick
ICEGENER works for VSAM files? Does IEBGENER? I thought it did not. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Steve Smith Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 12:06 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 It seems ironic

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Steve Smith
It seems ironic that Sri didn't suggest using ICEGENER instead of IDCAMS. For 5M+ records, I sure think I'd give it a try. Not that pointing that APAR wasn't very helpful. sas -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Frank Swarbrick
__ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 Thanks again, Sri. I just ran a test, specifying AMP=('BUFND=200,BUFNI=20') on the JCL for

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Frank Swarbrick
but my guess is no. :-) Frank From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Sri h Kolusu Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 >> Do you know why the APAR says it applies to

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Sri h Kolusu
>> Do you know why the APAR says it applies to "Software Version 210" instead of 230? Frank, Even though the issue is introduced in z/OS 2.3 , We built PTFs for the other releases(2.1 and 2.2) to forestall future problems that might have been exposed by later PTFs Thanks, Kolusu -

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Allan Staller
thx -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Sri h Kolusu Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 > Sri, > Can you provide any information as t

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Discussion List on behalf of Sri h Kolusu Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 > Sri, > Can you provide any information as to what introduced this error? The APAR description seems to indicate this was "a

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Sri h Kolusu
> Sri, > Can you provide any information as to what introduced this error? The APAR description seems to indicate this was "always there". Alan, It is NOT always there, the issue was introduced only in z/OS 2.3. The error description and problem determination explains the problem. Thanks, Kolu

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Allan Staller
t: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:10 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 Frank, Please make sure that you have OA54007 installed. https://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww-01.ibm.com%2Fsupport%2Fdocview.wss%3Fuid%3Disg1OA54007&am

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Allan Staller
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 I would verify the CISIZE on the old/new files. Buffering techniques? Contention? Region? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Tuesday, June 12

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Allan Staller
I would verify the CISIZE on the old/new files. Buffering techniques? Contention? Region? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IDCA

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Sri h Kolusu
Frank, Please make sure that you have OA54007 installed. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA54007 Thanks, Kolusu IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/12/2018 08:51:03 AM: > From: Frank Swarbrick > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 06/12/2018 08:51 AM > Subject: IDC

Re: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3

2018-06-12 Thread Lizette Koehler
I would open an SR - you may have found a "new" behavior Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Frank Swarbrick > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 8:51 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: IDCAMS REPRO very slow on z/OS 2.3 > > We just upg