W dniu 2018-11-12 o 17:50, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
[...]
Others:
o At times I've needed to resort to PDS rather than PDSE because of
cross-plex sharing constraints on PDSE.
o Does PDSE impose a stricter constraint on number of records in a
single member than PDS? Perhaps 16Mi?
Yes. PDSE
Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:28:44 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Nov 2018
arc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:28:44 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:35:55 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:28:44 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:35:55 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>
>>It's a shame that the capabilities of PDSE aren't a superset of the
>>capabilities
>>of PDS.
>
>They are, with the exception of scatter-load. I believe that is used only for
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:35:55 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>It's a shame that the capabilities of PDSE aren't a superset of the
>capabilities
>of PDS.
They are, with the exception of scatter-load. I believe that is used only for
the system nucleus.
--
Tom Marchant
In what language? IBM XLC C++ V2R3.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Beaver
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 1:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS
What is this load module written?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 10:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 8:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER xxxx EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
On 11/9/2018 3:24 PM, Cha
On 11/9/2018 3:24 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
The debug load module is 18MB. The release compile load module is 002FE160 = ~3
MB.
It's reassuring to know it's not YOUR inefficient code that's made this
module so massive! ;-)
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Brennan
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
In assembler I tended to code that way initially, while promising myself
I would add
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Brennan
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
In assembler I tended
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Brennan
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
http://www.mildredbrennan.com/mvs/error_logic.png
On 11/9/2018 2:32 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Geez, again
On Behalf
Of Joe du Plumber
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 2:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
Charles,
Check the module size again and refer to this statement in MVS Program
Management: User's Guide
and Reference (S
EXACTLY
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Brennan
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
http
http://www.mildredbrennan.com/mvs/error_logic.png
On 11/9/2018 2:32 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Geez, again, would it kill them to say that in the error message?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD
MODULES.
Doesn't that size value 011C5D10 mean that the load module is over 16M bytes
long? Does PDS support load modules that large? PDSE definitely does, I'm
just not certain about PDS.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IGW01203E MEMBER EXCEEDS LIMITATIONS FOR PDS LOAD MODULES.
Charles,
Check the module size again and refer to this statement in MVS Program
Management: User's Guide
and Reference (SA23-1393), Chapter 1 Introduction, subsection Using Utilities
Charles,
Check the module size again and refer to this statement in MVS Program
Management: User's Guide
and Reference (SA23-1393), Chapter 1 Introduction, subsection Using Utilities
for Program Management, heading IEBCOPY:
"However, you cannot convert a program object into a load module
Doesn't that size value 011C5D10 mean that the load module is over 16M bytes
long? Does PDS support load modules that large? PDSE definitely does, I'm
just not certain about PDS.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:22:33 -0600, Michael Babcock wrote:
>Funny you ran across this. We were applying maintenance to Db2 tools
>yesterday and received a message from the binder that said a PMO 3 object
>could not be stored in a PDS. Holddata for the PTF indicated we needed to
>convert the PDS
Funny you ran across this. We were applying maintenance to Db2 tools
yesterday and received a message from the binder that said a PMO 3 object
could not be stored in a PDS. Holddata for the PTF indicated we needed to
convert the PDS to PDSE. We did and all was well with the world. Don’t
21 matches
Mail list logo
