.
So maybe that will get into the next release after z/OS 3.1.
Jim Mulder
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 3:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Regarding RBINTCOD
On Tue, 30 Jan
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 20:05:50 +0200, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
>:>Jon P did write what I meant. Answer: no, it just makes it a lot more likely
>that the storage obtain for the SDWA will succeed.
>
>Sad.
I believe abend recovery R0=12 is virtually unheard of when SDWA is above the
line. Realize
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:17:15 + Peter Relson wrote:
:>
:>Are you implying that an ESTAE(X) routine with SDWALOC=31 is guaranteed an
:>SDWA and there is no reason to check R0 for 12 and alternate code paths?
:>
:>Jon P did write what I meant. Answer: no, it just makes it a lot more likely
Are you implying that an ESTAE(X) routine with SDWALOC=31 is guaranteed an
SDWA and there is no reason to check R0 for 12 and alternate code paths?
Jon P did write what I meant. Answer: no, it just makes it a lot more likely
that the storage obtain for the SDWA will succeed.
Peter Relson
z/OS
REGION=(24,31,64) memory limits is available
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:27 PM Jon Perryman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:40:04 +0200, Binyamin Dissen <
> bdis...@dissensoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Are you implying that an ESTAE(X) routine with SSWALOC=31 is guaranteed an
> >SDWA and there is no
REGIONX=(24,31,53) memory limits is available.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:27 PM Jon Perryman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:40:04 +0200, Binyamin Dissen <
> bdis...@dissensoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Are you implying that an ESTAE(X) routine with SSWALOC=31 is guaranteed an
> >SDWA and there is
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:40:04 +0200, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
>Are you implying that an ESTAE(X) routine with SSWALOC=31 is guaranteed an
>SDWA and there is no reason to check R0 for 12 and alternate code paths?
Obviously Peter is not making that guarantee but how many jobs run with
REGION=0M or
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:57:53 + Peter Relson wrote:
:>But none of this is appropriate to do within a recovery routine. That is why
there is an SDWA.
:>And if the system was unable to provide the ESTAE-type recovery routine with
an SDWA, then too bad (and encourage the creator to use
Thanks
> On Jan 29, 2024, at 7:58 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>
> Is there any way to know whether this is an SVC or abend
>
> I mean I know for SVC the length must be 2 but that doesn't mean it cannot
> be a abend
>
>
> Abend is an SVC. So you could conceivably look at RBINTCOD for
Is there any way to know whether this is an SVC or abend
I mean I know for SVC the length must be 2 but that doesn't mean it cannot
be a abend
Abend is an SVC. So you could conceivably look at RBINTCOD for x'000D'.
A different question would be whether you can tell that the error was not
10 matches
Mail list logo
