Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread fredb001
: IBMVM @ LISTSERV . UARK . EDU Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:35:19 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: IBM 1401 Paper tape is immune from magnetic interference (of course, back then there was no public documentation of EMF weapons, right?). Another paper tape story... when I was in

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Mike Walter
2009 02:06 PM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: IBM 1401 I'll be Dan for a minute. Way off topic Let's get back to z/VM :) "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Marcy Cortes
I'll be Dan for a minute. Way off topic Let's get back to z/VM :) "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message o

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Huegel, Thomas
g a tape from a fiche slide seems rather tedious to me. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of william JANULIN Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:36 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401 When I worked at a bank, w

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Tom Duerbusch
ppen to an ICBM's targeting if the tape was not fed in correctly. I hope there was something done to prevent that type of problem. Regards, Richard Schuh > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Wa

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
tserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:40 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401 No, the IBM 2671 paper tape device was a reader only. The paper tape punches were from older systems. I guess paper tape got punched on teletype machines in S/360 days.

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread william JANULIN
tape reader that they could feed the paper tape into (I don't remember the model number) to enter that transactions. --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Mike Walter wrote: > From: Mike Walter > Subject: Re: IBM 1401 > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 1:35 PM > Paper

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Schuh, Richard
-- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Walter > Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:35 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM 1401 > > Paper tape is immune from magnetic interference (of course, > back the

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Mike Walter
05/29/2009 11:49 AM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: IBM 1401 Trivia.. Recently I went to the Titan-II ICBM silo (now a museum) just outside Tucson, AZ .. Interesting fact, they loaded the program for the nucleaur tipp

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Huegel, Thomas
...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:40 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401 No, the IBM 2671 paper tape device was a reader only. The paper tape punches were from older systems. I guess paper tape got punched on teletype machines in S/360 days

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread william JANULIN
at machine in normal '360' mode, IPLing DOS off the 190 disk. --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Jim Bohnsack wrote: > From: Jim Bohnsack > Subject: Re: IBM 1401 > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 11:39 AM > No, the IBM 2671 paper tape device > was a reader

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Jim Bohnsack
No, the IBM 2671 paper tape device was a reader only. The paper tape punches were from older systems. I guess paper tape got punched on teletype machines in S/360 days. I had a customer with a 2671. I started keeping IBM sales manual pages that were "discard this page" when updates came out

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Mike Walter
necessarily represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates. "Schuh, Richard" Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" 05/29/2009 09:10 AM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: IBM 1401 Thanks, Lyn

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-29 Thread Schuh, Richard
System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Anne & Lynn Wheeler > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:41 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM 1401 > > rschuh wrote: > > The smaller systems, the 360-20 and 360-30 had a 1401 > emulator mode. It was= > >

Re: IBM 1401

2009-05-28 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
rschuh wrote: The smaller systems, the 360-20 and 360-30 had a 1401 emulator mode. It was= a h/w or mc based feature. I don't know whether larger machines had it. Th= ere was also a 1410 emulator mode on the -40. I do not know of any 1401 sup= port that ran under DOS, but my DOS experience is m

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-26 Thread John P. Baker
10:24 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR Now I beg the question, 'What is the difference between an "emulator", and a 'simulator"?'. I always thought they were differentiated in that the emulator req

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-26 Thread Schuh, Richard
y 26, 2009 8:46 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR > > I think you are right, altho I also think that an emulator > (if that is the name of the hardware piece) often would use > some kind of specialized code that wo

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-26 Thread Huegel, Thomas
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 9:44 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR COS--that's the name I was trying to think of. I think that there was th

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-26 Thread Jim Bohnsack
The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 9:44 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR COS--that's the name I was trying to think of. I think that there was the ability to run COS u

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-24 Thread Jim Bohnsack
lf Of Huegel, Thomas Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:16 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR On 360/25 there was a CSL (Control Storage Load)deck that could be loaded and then 1401 code ran 'native', no underlying DOS or OS system.=20 Th

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-23 Thread Matthew Donald
A 14xx microcode-based emulator was available for all models of the IBM 360 and some models of the 370. I ran a 1401 emulator under OS/VS1 on a 370/158 in the early 1970's Matthew On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Schuh, Richard wrote: > The smaller systems, the 360-20 and 360-30 had a 1401 emu

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-22 Thread John Bellomy
16 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR On 360/25 there was a CSL (Control Storage Load)deck that could be loaded and then 1401 code ran 'native', no underlying DOS or OS system. There was an emulator for 360/30 and 360/40 (DOS/26) we also r

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-22 Thread Huegel, Thomas
n emulator .. SIM1401 or SIM1400 something like that.. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Schuh, Richard Sent: Fri 5/22/2009 11:09 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR The smaller systems, the 360-20 and

Re: IBM 1401: was Re: z/VM 5.4 VSAM question - PJBR

2009-05-22 Thread Schuh, Richard
The smaller systems, the 360-20 and 360-30 had a 1401 emulator mode. It was a h/w or mc based feature. I don't know whether larger machines had it. There was also a 1410 emulator mode on the -40. I do not know of any 1401 support that ran under DOS, but my DOS experience is miniscule. There wa