Michael Friedrich wrote:
> hi,
>
> i've been thinking about https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1259 quite a bit
> today, and i wanted to try a new approach - not buffer ido2db, but
> buffer idomod between core and socket.
>
> the outcome can be reviewed on git, and i do think that with this
> commits, t
On 25.09.2011 02:25, Michael Friedrich wrote:
> hi,
>
> i've been thinking about https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1259 quite a bit
> today, and i wanted to try a new approach - not buffer ido2db, but
> buffer idomod between core and socket.
>
> the outcome can be reviewed on git, and i do think that w
On 25.09.2011 10:42, Bernd Erk wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> sounds like a good idea and will probably fix some old problems.
therefore testers needed - my test platform can't catch everything ;-)
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>
>
>
> Am 25.09.2011 um 02:29 schrieb "Michael
> Friedrich":
>
>> hi,
>>
>> i've
Hi Michael,
sounds like a good idea and will probably fix some old problems.
Regards
Bernd
Am 25.09.2011 um 02:29 schrieb "Michael Friedrich"
:
> hi,
>
> i've been thinking about https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1259 quite a bit
> today, and i wanted to try a new approach - not buffer ido2db
hi,
i've been thinking about https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1259 quite a bit
today, and i wanted to try a new approach - not buffer ido2db, but
buffer idomod between core and socket.
the outcome can be reviewed on git, and i do think that with this
commits, this really works. at least my system
