-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from Dan Melendez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New member seeks direction
Hello,
I am interested in the following topics:
1) Internet television(all related
Date:Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:37:29 -0500
From:"Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I think that making egress filtering a BCP, applying community
| pressure, bringing law suites, etc., will be about as effective
| at
From: Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
RFC 2418 states:
Interim meetings are subject to the
same rules for advance notification, reporting, open participation,
and process, which apply to other working group meetings.
...
- This applies to all face to face meetings held for
At 05:45 PM 2/14/00 -0700, Vernon Schryver wrote:
Unless you going
to slide the IETF the rest of the way into the ITU/IEEE/ANSI swamp, won't
the mailing lists continue to be the only official forums for the working
groups? Won't the working group meetings continue to be effectively
informal,
Phil Karn wrote:
tomorrow demands. And, agreed, bogus source IPs _does_ at present time
look like nothing but the devils work. But in, say, 10 years a new flashy
techology could be requiring that you have the ability to stamp packets with
other IPs than your own. Unfortunately, back in
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 12:57:57PM +1030, Mark Prior wrote:
The package being offered is a WaveLAN IEEE Turbo 11Mbps PC card for
AU$276.36 (approx US$175). Drivers are available from Lucent for (at
least) Windows 95, 98, NT, CE, 2000, MacOS and Linux.
Could people that are interested please
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I'm not a lawyer, but that sounds like it might conflict with the U.S.
Constitution's provisions concerning freedom of assembly.
(a) The U.S. constitution applies to the Federal government (and sometimes to
the state governments); it
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 10:31:16PM -0500, Dorian Kim wrote:
I'd be interested in borrowing a pair of wavelan cards.
*sigh*
apologies for not watching the cc: line.
-dorian
Let's see, how many RFC's are not in English? How many WG meetings
or mailinglists?
That the IETF is de facto an U.S. outfit is not by itself a bad thing.
You seem to be making the assumption that the English language is the
property of the USA. Perhaps, you have forgotten that the
Robert Elz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure there is a good analogy there.There's no good purpose
in sending packets with incorrect source addresses I can think of, and
stopping the practice is the basic intent of the filters.
"In his early days at Intel, Andy Grove was approached by an
Robert Elz wrote:
There's no good purpose
in sending packets with incorrect source addresses I can think of, and
stopping the practice is the basic intent of the filters.
Mobile IP would like to send out packets with the mobile node's
home address,
tomorrow demands. And, agreed, bogus source IPs _does_ at present time
look like nothing but the devils work. But in, say, 10 years a new flashy
techology could be requiring that you have the ability to stamp packets with
other IPs than your own. Unfortunately, back in year 2000, somebody put in
At 03:41 PM 02/14/2000 -0800, Charles E. Perkins wrote:
Mobile IP would like to send out packets with the mobile node's
home address, while it is attached to a network in a foreign
domain. The home address is likely to look "incorrect" from
the standpoint of such a filter.
If I'm not mistaken
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vernon Schryver writes
:
I'm not a lawyer, but that sounds like it might conflict with the U.S.
Constitution's provisions concerning freedom of assembly.
(a) The U.S. constitution applies to the Federal government (and sometimes to
the state governments); it
Lucent will be making available 802.11 DS wireless technology for the
forthcoming meeting in Adelaide. They have offered a similar deal to
Nortel at the last meeting where IETFers can loan a card for the
duration of the meeting and/or buy a card. They would like to get some
idea of how many
"Charles E. Perkins" wrote:
Robert Elz wrote:
There's no good purpose
in sending packets with incorrect source addresses I can think of, and
stopping the practice is the basic intent of the filters.
Mobile IP would like to send out packets
Steve,
Let's be clear: a DOS attack is something the end point itself can do
very little to prevent, since it usually fails or succeeds upstream of
that end point. Therefore, the end point relies on its upstream ISPs to
"do the right thing" and indeed, each of those ISPs relies on other ISPs
to
I would tend to agree with Lloyd
Regards
Mark Paton CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng
Mercury Network Systems Limited
+44 585 649051
http://www.mnsl.org
"Mercury Network Systems - The Unstoppable Force"
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee
named above. As this e-mail may contain
18 matches
Mail list logo
