From: "James P. Salsman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Device upload -- of any kind -- has not yet been implemented in Opera.
Which is not actually the fault of the HTML WG.
You know that the CTO of Opera software has said they will wait for a
W3C Recommendation (or Working Draft) on device upload.
I
Dear Dr. Pemberton,
Thank you for your reply:
I am sure we both want to resolve this. Would you please list all
the flaws of which you are aware -- with as little or as much detail
as you have time for -- along with, when available, how they could
be fixed? I promise you I will devote my
Title: RE: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position
what is wrong with all you people? i subscribed to this god-forsaken listserv hoping that i'd learn something. all i've learned is that you're a bunch of negative, argumentative, anti-collaborative bores. shame on you
At 03:16 PM 03/02/2000 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
MONDAY, March 27, 2000
0800-1930 IETF Registration - Foyer 1
0800-0900 Continental Breakfast - Foyer and Circulation Area
0900-0930 Opening Plenary Session - Hall E
0930-1130 Morning Sessions
APP appareaApplications Area
It has been recognized for some time that breaking
the end-to-end model through the introduction of elements
like network address translators causes serious problems
in IP networks, and the IETF has had ongoing discussions
of those problems with an eye towards solving them. What
is probably not
Hello:
Just a quick comment on 1601bis version 3
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-rfc1601bis-03.txt
It is not clear on why the IAB does not want to take time for
a retreat/ self-assessment of what really works and what not.
It seems that the IAB still does not want to empower
