Re: IETF Wireless

Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 15:29:07 +0200 (CEST) Randy Bush writes: | actually it might be a feature to torture the anti-nat bigots Maybe they wouldn't notice. Anyone using Kerberos will notice, I guarant

RE: still no Outlook patch

What is exactly your question/point? 1.- Is it that when is the security patch will exist? It already exists. 2.- Is it that those features were disabled? That is the main "feature of this patch. To disable any an all programs from using the outlook object model to send mail witho

still no Outlook patch

What happens when common-sense security measures come up against large software company development efforts? Have a look: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q262/7/00.asp Under "Features and Products That Are Affected by the Update": ] There is no work around for the following

Re: IETF Wireless

At 9:36 AM -0400 on 5/27/00, Jon Malis wrote: >>- It has no way to add extenal antennas to boost signal. > > You can, it just requires making a small "incision" in its side and a > voided warranty. (See: http://www.macintouch.com/airportantenna.html > For More Info) This echoes our experiences

Re: Storage over Ethernet/IP

In message , Brian.Rubarts@born .com writes: > >>> Encryption will be offloaded to the network interface. ASICs on the NICs >>> will greatly improve encryption and authentication performance. > >>all well and good, provided that this encryption and

Re: IETF Wireless

I Think That Ole J. Jacobsen Wrote In An eMail At 1:13 PM -0700 of 5/26/00: >- It has no way to add extenal antennas to boost signal. You can, it just requires making a small "incision" in its side and a voided warranty. (See: http://www.macintouch.com/airportantenna.html For More Info) >Now

Re: IETF Wireless

I Think That Roger Fajman Wrote In An eMail At 4:58 PM -0400 of 5/26/00: > > These are absolutely standard 11Mb/s IEEE 802.11DS base stations, not > > some proprietary Apple thing. PC users can get 802.11DS cards from > > companies like Lucent: > >Is there a way to tu

Re: IETF Wireless

I Think That Derrell D. Piper Wrote In An eMail At 1:44 PM -0700 of 5/26/00: > > - You need a Macintosh to configure it > >There is a Windows-based configuration utility that I've seen used to >configure the Airport sucessfully. See the "Karlbridge configurator for >Windows" link on the page li

Re: IETF Wireless

I Think That I Wrote In An eMail At 7:08 PM -0400 of 5/26/00: >I Think That Roger Fajman Wrote In An eMail At 4:58 PM -0400 of 5/26/00: >> >>We've had trouble here with PCs using them because the NAT implementation >>doesn't handle NETBIOS. Also, given the general dislike of many people >>in the

Re: IETF Wireless

Randy Bush writes: | actually it might be a feature to torture the anti-nat bigots Maybe they wouldn't notice. Sean.

AirPort or WaveLAN Access Point MIBs ?

If someone could send me a unicast reply email with a pointer to the SMI for the private MIBs implemented by the Apple Airport and/or the Lucent WaveLAN Access Point, that would be much appreciated. If the reply mail is unicast to me, I'll package up a summary and send the summar