Can anybody suggest a good mail
server on Unix pls. We are currently using SIMS 2.0 from SUN and need one more
other than this.
Thanx
-Faheem.
R e l @ t i o n s h
i p s w e r e n e v e
r s o e a s y
I
suggest strongly "qmail". You can process 10,000 mail over 486X machine with
qmail. For more futher info:
www.qmail.org
Ilker
G.
-Original Message-From: Faheem Ahmed Khan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 9:22
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Suggest a
Perhaps one of the solution would be to limit the amount of addressees one
email can go out to simultaneously. Imagine Joe Spammer would have to send
out his junk say to max 30 addresses at a time. Or even 100. It would not
impair normal users because we do not send mail to more than a few
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:21:10 -, "Dawson, Peter D" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
The MX admin.. can limit the no of addressess/per outgoing mail
I'm assuming that if there's an "MX admin", that you're referring to a software
package called 'MX', and not the 'MX' DNS record - the MX DNS record
Hi there Folks
Juat a quickie, anyone know where I can get information relating to
Universal Mobile Telecommunication Service (UMTS) ?
Thank Jon.
Jonathan Parkinson
EMEA Operations Management Center.
Remote Server and Network Management Group.
Unix Support .
Compaq Computer
Title: RE: Suggest a good email server pls
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 4:47 PM
To: Faheem Ahmed Khan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suggest a good email server pls
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:51:44 +0530,
Try http://www.umts-forum.org/
and http://www.etsi.org for 3GPP.
Regards, EIK
__
Erkki I. Kolehmainen
TIEKE Tietotekniikan kehittämiskeskus ry
TIEKE Finnish Information Technology Development Centre
Salomonkatu 17 A, 10th floor, FIN-00100 HELSINKI,
A couple of people have pointed out in private email that I should
not have posted my understanding of CAUCE's relationship with DMA
without substantiation.
Personally I don't see how such things can ever be substantiated
anyway - it seems to be the nature of politics that you rarely
have
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 09:35:23PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
And I hope that the courts will finally realize that freedom of speech
includes the freedom not to have your communications disrupted by people
who want to sell you things.
The biggest problem with the bill, as it currently reads,
To be perfectly honest, the relation between CAUCE (Coalition Against
Unsolicited Commercial Email) and the DMA (Direct Marketers' Assocation)
makes perfect sense. Spam has a negative effect on profits of members of
the DMA, because DMA members do their business through postal mail.
Therefore,
The bottom line is that although the bill has some unsavory aspects (hey,
this is politics, dontcha know), it is well intended, and restoral of the
banner notification could be a serious tool in the fight against junk
email.
sure, but there's no way the DMA is going to let that happen.
Perhaps one of the solution would be to limit the amount of addressees one
email can go out to simultaneously. Imagine Joe Spammer would have to send
out his junk say to max 30 addresses at a time. Or even 100. It would not
impair normal users because we do not send mail to more than a few
not chat :)
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:56:57 PDT, Dave Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
not chat :)
Umm.. I don't see anything in the RFC822 syntax that prohibits a null
message body. On most Unix systems,
/bin/mailx -s "Your One liner here" [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
does what you want (modulo a "Null
-Original Message-
From: Parkinson, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 June 2000 17:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Universal Mobile Telecommunication Service (UMTS)
Hi there Folks
Just a quickie, anyone know where I can get information
relating to Universal
Dave,
In the "old times" many used "$" for the sought after eom.
Several use "[]" nowadays for that purpose (may be because it is
similar to the end-of-article symbol in magazines like TIME).
Danny
unscribe
In newspaper lingo -30- means "the end", as at the end of an article or
story. At the bottom of a page for a story that continues, one puts "more";
if it's the end of the story, one puts "-30-" or " # ". This is the copy in
the office. It doesn't appear in the newspaper or magazine.
19 matches
Mail list logo
