By my count, that's 7 to 3 in favor of "Internet Mail Service".
What is your count?
My count is 4 to 2 right now, but I have no reason to doubt you,
and believe that it will equal your count shortly.
Any system can be messed up. I blame only the first of the four notices
from [EMAIL
Christopher Ambler wrote:
I don't agree, and merely wanted to point out that other mail systems
have the same problem. There is anti-virus software for Notes, too.
But a sane mail system does not *spread* viruses.
To say that IMS is "designed to be a trojan horse" just seems a little
Title: GR-303 MIB BOF
I know this is going way back, but can anyone tell me if anything came out of the GR-303 MIB BOF at the 46th IETF in Washington, Nov 99? I read the meeting report and it seemed that there would be more activity on this, but I have been unable to find anything.
Rick
From: John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't agree, and merely wanted to point out that other mail systems
have the same problem. There is anti-virus software for Notes, too.
But a sane mail system does not *spread* viruses.
And people I'd want to hire even indirectly through a retail
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:28:48 -0700 (MST), Vernon Schryver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't agree, and merely wanted to point out that other mail systems
have the same problem. There is anti-virus software for Notes, too.
But a sane mail system does
Ted Gavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Those persons who are responsible for managing Microsoft Exchange
implementations should know that Out-Of-Office responses, as well as
anti-virus application auto-notifications can be given permission to
send to the Internet, just as they can be DENIED
I hate to have to give a basic lesson on this stuff on, of all places,
the IETF mailing list, but it appears that some folks around here
don't know the details of of mail delivery.
Lots of people keep saying "Gee, well, exchange lets you turn off
sending out of office messages to the internet.
I'm saying that people who are too lazy or witless to pick software that
does not cause them to make pests of themselves have no place trying to
develop network protocols.
I'm sorry, but I take offense at this. I am neither lazy nor witless, and I
chose Exchange. I configured it around its
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Christopher Ambler wrote:
Is Exchange broken? Undoubtedly so. Is there a way that a clueful
user can overcome the break? Absolutely. Should the software be
"banned?" Of course not. If anything, unsubscribe those users who
can't take the trouble to ensure that their
