Who are these people?
Perhaps they are from the majority of humans who use languages
written with glyphs absent from ASCII (and I don't mean Smalltalk-79.)
Or maybe they have a pressing need to use the International
Phonetic Alphabet entities because the "new economy" synchronous
telephony
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:26:07AM -0800, James P. Salsman wrote:
Who are these people?
Perhaps they are from the majority of humans who use languages
written with glyphs absent from ASCII (and I don't mean Smalltalk-79.)
Or maybe they have a pressing need to use the International
Frank and all,
It seems that you are one of several that have thus far expressed
some dismay and concern about this "Code of Conduct" document
and/or idea. I am one of those. I agree with all of your comments
here. The are well stated and I believe accurately express reasonable
concerns.
When we consider applications services there are many logical points
to call the network edge, for just one example see
draft-erickson-opes-taxonomy-00.txt
At 12:10 PM 2/8/2001 +0100, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
At 09:17 08/02/2001 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, I agree
Interestingly, 8.5 x 11 comes about because of writing, not reading.
Books are smaller than 8.5 x 11. Tablets are 8.5 x 11, and typewriters
copied that. Laser printers copied typewriters. Stenographers used smaller
tablets because they had to hold them in their hands rather than put them on
The IETF+Censored mailing list
At times, the IETF list is subject to debates that have little to do
with the purposes for which the IETF list was created. Some people
would appreciate a "quieter" forum for the relevant
