At 12:43 AM 1/17/2002, Rodney Thayer wrote:
If we seriously used the time on friday, thus making thursday
night more legitmate to schedule staying in town, that would help.
I'd be curious to know what would define using Friday seriously. We do
usually put meetings on Friday which also have a
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, John Klensin wrote:
[snip]
* And should the IAB try to control microphone time, or is it
better to let people explain their views at whatever length that
takes?
Definitely. How aggressively is another question (mainly a function of
people's interest in the subject and
I think two plenary's is a good idea.
If we seriously used the time on friday, thus making thursday
night more legitmate to schedule staying in town, that would help.
also would mitigate the horrible double booking of wg meetings
I think devoting Thursday night to a plenary is one factor
* If so, should we continue with IESG on Wednesday and IAB on
Thursday, or should we alternate them (or adopt some more
radical schedule change -- probably too late for Minneapolis at
this point).
I like the idea of keeping to the two-plenary schedule at every IETF.
* And should the IAB
Fred == Fred Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fred At 12:43 AM 1/17/2002, Rodney Thayer wrote:
If we seriously used the time on friday, thus making thursday night
more legitmate to schedule staying in town, that would help.
Fred I'd be curious to know what would define using
Matt == Matt Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt I think devoting Thursday night to a plenary is one factor that
Matt helps to undermine Friday's status as a real working day.
Matt In most cases, Tuesday noght could have been used for a plenary
Matt with no adverse impact
A couple of things happen with Friday meetings.
One is, there aren't enough of them. It makes it hard to justify
staying the extra day.
The other thing is, recently, they've had a habit of scheduling
multiple common interest meetings on top of each other, like
PKIX and PGP, or two security
At 02:04 PM 1/17/2002 -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Sunday with little to do other than catch up on work that really
should have been done before I arrived. So maybe doing more on Sunday
would be a possibility.
This is an interesting suggestion.
The two negatives are that a) some people do not
At 01:42 PM 1/16/2002, John Klensin wrote:
* Should we continue with the two-plenary model? Should we do
so at every IETF, or consider some sort of periodic or
occasional schedule?
The two plenary model is good since it gives us time needed to address the
issues.
If people want to participate,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Rodney == Rodney Thayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rodney I think two plenary's is a good idea.
Rodney If we seriously used the time on friday, thus making thursday
Rodney night more legitmate to schedule staying in town, that would
Rodney
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:34:35AM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
At 02:04 PM 1/17/2002 -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Sunday with little to do other than catch up on work that really
should have been done before I arrived. So maybe doing more on Sunday
would be a possibility.
This is an
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Just to add my experience. I find that in order to get
better airline rates I am forced to travel into town on
Saturday. So I'm in town on Sunday with little to do
other than catch up on work that really should have been
done before I arrived. So maybe doing more on
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:17:52 PST, Michel Py said:
Sacramento to Minneapolis, no connections:
- Arrive Minneapolis Sunday afternoon, leave friday afternoon: round trip $1049
- Arrive Minneapolis Saturday evening, leave friday morning: round trip $289
SAME AIRLINE (Northwest), same planes.
Sunday with little to do other than catch up on work that really
should have been done before I arrived. So maybe doing more on Sunday
would be a possibility.
This is an interesting suggestion.
The two negatives are that a) some people do not work on Sunday, and 2)
those currently
I've known several folks who have Sunday booked solid with
business/design-team/etc meetings weeks before the actual IETF begins.
I would personally prefer extending into Friday...
aol me too /aol
randy
I actually think our scheduling is within epsilon of optimal. Five days
(currently Sunday evening - Friday morning) seems to be about as much
as we can handle anyway. No matter which day of the week we end on,
many people are going to leave a bit early, and the last meeting slot
is going to
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 02:04 , Jeffrey Altman wrote:
I find that in order to get better airline rates I am forced to travel
into town on Saturday. So I'm in town on Sunday ...
So maybe doing more on Sunday would be a possibility.
I believe that (at least for US-homed travellers)
Responding to the total collection of this thread.
You all could save a lot of group meeting time by publishing all
those regular Reports (RFC-Ed, etc, et al) on the IETF Web site or
via EMail. After all they are mostly cut and dried with no
discussion, prepared long in advance.
Further,
18 matches
Mail list logo
