Christian Huitema wrote:
Your fears appear to be based more on emotions than facts. To the best
of my knowledge, the TCP/IP stack that ships in Windows conforms to
the IETF standards and interoperates with the stacks that ship on
other platforms -- it is certainly meant to. Several Microsoft
Thus spake Eliot Lear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Huitema wrote:
Your fears appear to be based more on emotions than facts. To the best
of my knowledge, the TCP/IP stack that ships in Windows conforms to
the IETF standards and interoperates with the stacks that ship on
other platforms --
--On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 08:52:17 -0500 Stephen Sprunk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft's application protocols (e.g. CIFS aka NetBIOS, Kerberos) are
certainly problematic, but I've heard no complaints about their IP stack
in several years.
Also, this entire paranoia stems AFAICT
From: Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
OTOH, does anyone have any evidence Microsoft is attempting to embrace and
extend at or below the transport layer? This smells like a reporter's
paranoia.
Microsoft's application protocols (e.g. CIFS aka NetBIOS, Kerberos) are
certainly
T == TOMSON ERIC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
T Is Palladium (TCP/MS) a real/serious threat?
As compared to a skilled sniper in a white van? No.
T Do we have to be afraid of it?
Let me reframe this in another perspective:
If you put razor blades in your mouth, should you be afraid
access-list 100 deny ip 207.46.230.218 0.0.0.0 12.246.56.92 0.0.0.0 gt 1
access-list 100 permit ip any any
oh well. :)
10/21/02 9:37:42 AM, Haren Visavadia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Microsoft can not produce secure products, what chance is there of
them producing a secure protocol?
IETF is
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:42:03 BST, Sean Jones said:
Forgive my ignorance, but what the heck do you mean?
% dig -x 207.46.230.218
;; ANSWER SECTION:
218.230.46.207.in-addr.arpa. 2665 INPTR microsoft.com.
218.230.46.207.in-addr.arpa. 2665 INPTR microsoft.net.
-Original Message-
From: Franck Martin [mailto:franck;sopac.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 10:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Global PKI standard?
Hi all,
I have promised to send something about my views on how to establish a
global PKI. Here it is.
The document started from
