Active Directory and DNS/Kerberos/LDAP/PKCS/X.500

2002-10-23 Thread Brian Bisaillon
Hello, I meant to say c) I know that the Active Directory schema does not follow the X.400 schema strictly. Therefore, what are the deviations? instead of X.500 sorry... Brian B.

Active Directory and DNS/Kerberos/LDAP/PKCS/X.500

2002-10-23 Thread Brian Bisaillon
Hello, I already know that Active Directory can integrate with ISC BIND. In addition, I can use ISC DHCP. However, I would like to ask the following questions about Active Directory (I'm not an expert on this): a) How standards-compliant is Active Directory's LDAP implementation? b) Are there

Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)

2002-10-23 Thread John Stracke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And anyhow, using a router block is a bad idea in this case. There's two cases - either you still have machines using that vendor's software, and you WANT them to reach the servers so they can update, That doesn't necessarily follow. I read a report (*) today that th

RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)

2002-10-23 Thread Bill Strahm
Well the first thing you have to realize is that there is no such thing as TCP/MS, and there for any answer you get would be highly speculative at best. This is a huge red herring, based on speculation that for some unknown reason, Microsoft will Embrace/Extend/Extinguish the IP protocol and succe

Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)

2002-10-23 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:37:44 BST, Sean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Why is a PTR (or DNS) record with MS TCP different from the standard TCP/IP record? > > (Perhaps it is me in my ignorance, or lack of understanding :o) ) It's not different. Or in any case, it's not sufficiently differen

FC: FDA permits use of implantable ID chips in humans (fwd)

2002-10-23 Thread Joe Baptista
inventory time - will those chips be ipv6 enabled? -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:25:11 -0400 From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FC: FDA permits use of implantable ID chips in humans [There are two obvious questions: Shoul

RE: WP: Attack On Internet Called Largest Ever

2002-10-23 Thread Joe Baptista
These are all good questions i'm looking forwqard to see answered. The attack was amaturish and a clear indication the attackers had no idea how to agrevate dns vulnerabilities. They could of done better with the resources at their disposal. On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote: > > It'

Re: [isdf] Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)

2002-10-23 Thread Robert Moskowitz
At 08:40 AM 10/22/2002 -0600, Vernon Schryver wrote: Again, other big organizations (specifically including Cisco) are not above embracing-and-extending out of ignorance, provincialism, and failures to bother to do interoperability testing (possible causes of the Microsoft PPP hassles) if not mal

Policy Based VoIP Security

2002-10-23 Thread Choudhary, Abdur R (Rahim)
In operations that need decision-making in the (near) realtime, policy framework is a good input. For that, the OSS can efficiently use the policy framework if it is itself policy based. Examples of QoS and NMS are common. However "Security" seems just as strong a candidate (if not stronger) fo

RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)

2002-10-23 Thread Sean Jones
Good Morning Valdis Thank you for your prompt reply. Perhaps I did not phrase my question properly. I know what PTR records are, I know how TCP/IP works & etc (I've done a routed IP network or two, and worked at an ISP for a while) so please let me re-phrase my question. Why is a PTR (or DNS)