Re: Appeal against IESG decision

2003-02-15 Thread Leslie Daigle
Robert, all, Here is the IAB's response to this appeal, as it is queued to be announced on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Leslie. On Saturday, January 4th 2003, Robert Elz filed an appeal with the Internet Architecture Board (IAB). The appeal co

Vienna IETF dates

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Crocker
The web page shows the dates for Vienna as "July 13-18, 2003 (tentative)". When will the dates be firm, so that folks can commit to travel arrangements? d/ -- Dave Brandenburg InternetWorking t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850

Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

2003-02-15 Thread Mark . Andrews
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Server 1 master for example.com and slave for division.example.com. > [ and division.example.com decides to change its NS records: ] > > You receive email with the new delegation information. You update > > example.com > > Your hypothetical scenario breaks down h

Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

2003-02-15 Thread D. J. Bernstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Server 1 master for example.com and slave for division.example.com. [ and division.example.com decides to change its NS records: ] > You receive email with the new delegation information. You update > example.com Your hypothetical scenario breaks down here, for two re

Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

2003-02-15 Thread Robert Elz
Date:15 Feb 2003 04:29:44 - From:"D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |* The BIND company's ``AXFR clarifications'' try to eliminate the | RFC 1034 database-consistency requirements, allowing data for the | same

Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

2003-02-15 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:25:40 -0500 (EST) From:Dean Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: | > RFC1035 specifically suggests using separate data structures | > that ensure that no such m