On 30-nov-03, at 4:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The at current burn rate assumption is far from safe though...
Oh? Have any better-than-handwaving reasons to suspect the current
allocation rate will change drastically?
I have a slightly better than handwaving indication that the current
% Anycast may even have preceded the creation of ICANN - perhaps an IETF
% source or one of the root server operators can say when the first ANYCAST
% deployments were done.
Not an IETF source. In discussions on the earliest anycast
instance, there was general agreement that M was
Iljitsch van Beijnum writes:
It seems there are (or were) 450 million bicycles in China. Think about
it: what's cheaper to mass produce, a 20 kilo steel bicycle with lots
of intricate mechanics, or a simple 1 kilo plastic sub-laptop?
The bicycle, by far. The mechanics are not intricate, the
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I have a slightly better than handwaving indication that the current
statistics don't show the full picture. In the past 4 years we've seen
large scale always-on internet access deployment. However, this
doesn't show up in the address space usage statistics. So
i'm going to bend my own policy a bit and reply to a role account:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (jfcm) writes:
... The interest is not sites nor network protection layers, but nations
protection from what happens on or with the networks. This is in line
with the White House document
At 17:35 30/11/03, Michael H. Lambert wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dear jfc,
As far as I can tell, you have gone only by your initials on this
thread. To help some of us weigh this discussion, could you please
identify yourself by name and affiliation?
Sorry for this. The question was
IETF is to deliver technical solutions. IANA is to deliver a registry
service. What is ICANN up to? Except what we agree: to guest forums to
help consensus there.
BTW is that very different from ITU? Just that Paul Twomey's Nov 19th
document would have resulted from a painstakingly g/sTLD
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:42:18 EST, Dean Anderson said:
The main criticism of the IETF/IANA/ICANN by the rest of the world seems
to fall under the democratic constituencies issue. People outside the US
seem to distrust the US, and feel that their voices are not being heard,
and that they
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, vinton g. cerf wrote:
I can't seem to recall during my 2 1/2 years on ICANN's board that there
ever was any non-trivial discussion, even in the secrecy of the Board's
private e-mail list or phone calls, on the matters of IP address
allocation or operation of the DNS root
karl wrote:
...
ICANN's job is not to make decisions in secret, by unknown members of
staff, based on unknown criteria and using unknown assumptions. ...
that sentence is punctuated incorrectly. there's a period after decisions.
... so, which is what you are saying has been done, is
karl, we raised the question of anycast risk with SECSAC in response to your
concerns and the conclusion was that the risks had not materialized in the
operation of anycast in roots that had already deployed it.
There are lots of ways in which routing can be wedged - until we get some
form of
11 matches
Mail list logo
