Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard

2004-08-14 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric A. Hall) wrote on 13.08.04 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:45:24 -0400: this is an application for a media-type. it's not trying to define the mbox format, it's just trying to define a label for the mbox format that

Re: Last Call: 'The APPLICATION/MBOX Media-Type' to Proposed Standard

2004-08-14 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:33:18 -0400 From:Eric A. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Others should note that RFC2048 is designed to facilitate registrations -- | more definitions for common data-types are widely preferred over a |

RE: Question about use of RSVP in Production Networks

2004-08-14 Thread Dean Anderson
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Tony Hain wrote: Dean Anderson wrote: RSVP is a idea that doesn't cut the mustard in the real world. There are several show-stopper problems with RSVP. Propagating clueless FUD does not result in progress. That is true. Lets try to keep the FUD to a minimum.