Vernon Schryver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Eric S. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your two people to go to on this would be RMS (representing the FSF)
or me (representing the OSI); between us I believe we can speak for
over 95% of the community.
I hate it when elected politicans presume to
Please remember that IETF adheres to a consensus process, which is not a
democratic process. There is no representation by delegation but
representation by competence. Because at the end of the day one does not
count votes but serious opponents. The target is to present a solution non
one will
A very small comment - I've noticed that successful IETF protocols have had
an open source or at least publically available code. This gives groups and
organizations an opportunity to use these new protocols. I'd generally
recommend most WGs to consider mechanisms to make code available for the
Hi Folks,
In the process of submitting I-Ds to the new improved specs, I had
reason to look at (and cut-and-paste from) the fine I-D guidelines
document.
I also tried out the XML2RFC 1.26 web service, and can attest that it
adds no pain over
and above that intrinsic in the use of XML (i.e.
