These topics are being discussed in the simple working group. I'd
suggest you direct future queries there as they are likely to result in
a faster response.
To briefly answer your question, a SUBSCRIBE is also used to query. The
Expires header field is set to zero. This tells the presence serve
On Tue March 15 2005 16:24, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
> following document:
>
> - 'Scripting Media Types '
> as an Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments
On 4/6/2005 11:20, Bruce Lilly allegedly wrote:
> Using an XML-specific editor basically substitutes manually
> typing tags by a search for a pointing device, selection from a menu,
> etc. (avoiding typos while entering long tags, but interrupting the
> mental flow of writing content to search for
On Wednesday, April 06, 2005 12:23:03 PM +0200 Jeroen Massar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 11:52 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Well, I thought I'd try something daring. We have people
arguing about xml versus nroff (again). If you write Internet
Drafts, try this toy (and onl
On Apr 6, 2005 7:10 AM, Alex Rousskov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005/04/06 (MDT), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have to admit that I use nroff about 75% of the time and XML about
> > 25%, I'm much happier about the postscript/PDF output options from
> > nroff than from XML,
>
> To be
> Date: 2005-04-06 10:03
> From: Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I can't understand why you basically say that nroff can be typed
> manually, but XML requires an editor.
>
> I've never used an XML editor and have.. what, a couple of dozen
> drafts, many of them RFCs already. I've used so
Bruce Lilly wrote:
Not if the primary output is unusable. But maybe I missed your point...
Yes. Don't like the software? Write your own...
Eliot
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Apr 6, 2005 5:38 AM, Bruce Lilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The biggest problem with XML editors is that they are unproductive.
> Editing XML in all of the ones I've seen goes something like:
> [mouse,icon,click,type a bit,mouse,...]
I've found that I can mostly avoid the mouse using XMLmind'
On Wed April 6 2005 08:03, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> Bruce Lilly wrote:
>
> >
> > Such as line breaks in the middle of words, followed by loss of
> > indentation?
> >
> > N.B. no smiley.
>
> So what?
So if the primary purpose of a piece of software is to produce
properly-formatted text documents,
Bruce Lilly wrote:
...
The number of text editors is very large and probably growing.
The biggest problem with XML editors is that they are unproductive.
Editing XML in all of the ones I've seen goes something like:
1. hunt for mouse
2. move cursor to nondescript icon and click
3. try to figure out
Hi
Greetings again
Could any one help in clarifying the below issue
please?
Thanks
GandhiSivakumar
ProjectManager
NM-Research,
MBT,India
- Original Message -
From: Rg
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:09 AM
Subject: Presence -Watcher clarification
Hi
Greet
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Bruce Lilly wrote:
A text editor -- any text editor -- suffices for nroff source. That
includes vi, emacs, textpad (MS Windows), SiED (PalmOS), etc. In
theory, there exist commercial XML editors for PalmOS, but I suspect
thay they are less productive than the ones on other pla
On Tue April 5 2005 19:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, but speaking from personal experience, that doesn't mean they'll use
> _your_ nroff sources.
True. But the opportunity is there.
> Bruce, with all due respect, the effort you have expended on developing this
> seems to me to be headed i
And I didn't say "voting"; that was Jeroen.
The free site I found says "voting"; of course, what the IETF
can use such things for is only straw polls. But in a case
like the present one, I think that is a reasonable way of
finding out what the centre of gravity of opinion is.
In ASCII art:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Jeroen Massar
>
> On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 11:52 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > Well, I thought I'd try something daring. We have people
> > arguing about xml versus nroff (again). If you write Internet
> > Drafts, try this toy (an
Bruce Lilly wrote:
Such as line breaks in the middle of words, followed by loss of
indentation?
N.B. no smiley.
So what? The nice thing about an XML format is that if you don't like
the representation you can change it without changing the source. Isn't
that nice?!
Eliot
_
On Tue April 5 2005 23:56, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> I suspect
> there is something specific to xml2rfc plain text output that a simple
> script can detect while grepping through the drafts archive.
Such as line breaks in the middle of words, followed by loss of
indentation?
N.B. no smiley.
__
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 11:52 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Well, I thought I'd try something daring. We have people
> arguing about xml versus nroff (again). If you write Internet
> Drafts, try this toy (and only vote once, please...).
> If the toy doesn't work, don't blame me... I just found th
Well, I thought I'd try something daring. We have people
arguing about xml versus nroff (again). If you write Internet
Drafts, try this toy (and only vote once, please...).
If the toy doesn't work, don't blame me... I just found the
site with Google.
http://www.internationalvoting.com/int3/ask.cgi?
19 matches
Mail list logo
