I'll address just a few points:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Bruce Lilly wrote:
> > The audio/amr format contains identical media data, but the RTP
> > transport is defined to strip the initial magic number, which is
> > redundant with fields in the RTP protocol headers. The wide band
> > version o
The new streaming effort continues for IETF 63. All eight parallel tracks
as well as the plenaries will be covered. It is our hope that this effort
will continue to provide useful timely and accessible access to the
proceedings of the IETF as they happen.
An internet draft (revised since IETF
On 12 Jul 2005, at 13:43, Bruce Lilly wrote:
Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 15, Issue 19
Date: 2005-07-11 19:13
From: Colin Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: iesg@ietf.org
CC: ietf@ietf.org, Stephen Casner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Now the initial internet-draft deadline has passed I want to respond
to the
On 07/12/2005 11:48 AM, Steve Silverman allegedly wrote:
> I registered for the social event in Paris, paid for it, and then
> received several emails asking
> for my credit card info from Kim Wallet, purportedly from
> france-connection. Is this legitimate or a phishing expedition?
> No I haven'
I registered for the social event in Paris, paid for it, and then
received several emails asking
for my credit card info from Kim Wallet, purportedly from
france-connection. Is this legitimate or a phishing expedition?
No I haven't responded to the emails.
Steve
___
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 8:15 PM +0200 7/11/05, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > > At 5:15 PM +0200 7/6/05, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > >
> > > > RFC 2434 doesn't discuss null IANA sections at all. RFC2434bis
> > > > does discuss them, and we will need to
On Tue July 12 2005 02:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What I would like is that the RFC Index would accurately convey the current
> status of any RFC. So, if I needed to check the status of a protocol which
> I am not intimately familiar with, I would not need to subscribe to a WG
> mailing list
Bruce Lilly wrote:
On Tue July 12 2005 05:25, Brian Carpenter wrote (via ietf-announce):
The Tools Team was set up by Harald Alvestrand and has made
good progress (e.g. draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-09,
which has been approved as an Informational RFC).
Now it's time to update the team's ch
On Tue July 12 2005 05:25, Brian Carpenter wrote (via ietf-announce):
> The Tools Team was set up by Harald Alvestrand and has made
> good progress (e.g. draft-ietf-tools-draft-submission-09,
> which has been approved as an Informational RFC).
>
> Now it's time to update the team's charter. Please
> Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 15, Issue 19
> Date: 2005-07-11 19:13
> From: Colin Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> CC: ietf@ietf.org, Stephen Casner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Now the initial internet-draft deadline has passed I want to respond
> to the main points of this message.
Yes, this seems pretty close to the IETF DPW. Unfortunately, the draft
has expired (I saw the report on the experiment, but even that seems
rather preliminary, in that no actual action to HISTORIC has been
taken). Is there a plan to act on the recommendation of
draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00 in the
Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't see any discussion of the RFC Editor retaining null IANA
> > sections in RFC2434bis, which is good. It is a completely silly idea. An
> > RFC should contain useful, long-lasting information. The fact that a
> > particular document didn't
Bruce Lilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless I misunderstood your earlier comments, Ned, you suggested that the
> requirement should be dropped. Which would presumably mean that the idnits
> check against that requirement would be dropped, and then there would be
> the very real possibility,
> My biggest concern here is not the IESG itself, it's the folk who
> presume to speak on its behalf.
This is a valid concern, and one that has made me cringe multiple
times. I've too often heard of reports where someone says "but the
IESG will never accept this", or "that's not what AD foo says",
14 matches
Mail list logo
