On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
Does this mean that you think the IETF should disband the ASRG, drop all
current I-D's relating to spam, and quit working on spam issues?
Yes. The last time I checked, the IETF was about manifesting genius level
ideas into functional
Paul,
That seems like the most resonable approach to me. Are current requests
archived now?
John
-- original message --
Subject:Re: I-D
ACTION:draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-02.txt
From: Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 07/22/2005 11:03 pm
At 3:51 PM
Dean Anderson wrote:
...
It is too bad you didn't take the opportunity to clear up the ambiguity of
whether you want the IETF to stop work on spam issues.
Please stop playing rhetorical games on our list.
Brian
___
Ietf mailing list
An additional update reflecting yesterdays changes is now available at
http://www.ofcourseimright.com/~lear/ietf63.ics.
Additional stuff:
- UIDs *should* be stable across changes.
- An attempt has been made to make proper use of SEQUENCE
- An attempt has been made to parse out LOCATION
The reason that there is no consensus in the spam area is that most
proposed solutions are claiming to solve the whole problem (or
at least a big chunk of it) but are grossly overstating their
applicability. To some degree this is because people want to have
the prize of creating _the_
The timing on this one was too good to ignore:
URL: http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=969926
Title: At 117 Degrees - No One Escapes the Heat
I could go for Mexico, but Las Vegas is just so weird!
Thanks,
Spencer
From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: shogunx [EMAIL
Sounds like a great idea. I'm looking forward to additional detail
about how decisions are reached as well as more clarity in the
description of those decisions.
Thanks, Brian...
- Ralph
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 15:19 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
The IESG is interested in carrrying out an
I'm looking at the IETF information page for transport to/from the
airport for the upcomomg meeting
http://www.ietf.org/meetings/transport_63.html and comparing it with
the information I'm finding on the RATP web site.
I think something is wrong. The only header on the IETF page is From
Charles
I think something is wrong. The only header on the IETF page is
From Charles de Gaulle Airport, and yet most of the instructions
seem to be germane for the Orly airport (specifically, the
instructions for the Metro Line 1 and the RER line C)
I you read the From CDG as only applying to the
Both Orly and CDG airports are serviced by RER B (blue on the map). From
Orly you have to take the monorail to get to the Antony station; CDG has
direct service.
When in RER B, exit the train at Chatelet-Les Halles (some RER trains do
not stop at every station but all trains will stop there).
At
10 matches
Mail list logo
