Re: Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

2006-02-08 Thread Leslie Daigle
Dear Mr. Mehnle, This is to acknowledge receipt of your message. The IAB will review the material and provide you a response. Best regards, Leslie, IAB Chair. Julian Mehnle wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To the Internet Architecture Board, as per the Internet Standard

Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

2006-02-08 Thread Julian Mehnle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To the Internet Architecture Board, as per the Internet Standards Process, section 6.5, and on behalf of the SPF project, I am hereby appealing the IESG's decision[2] on 2005-12-08 to publish the draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 I-D[3] as an Experimental R

Re: Meeting Survey Results

2006-02-08 Thread Spencer Dawkins
And only 7% say that the $50US fee hike might stop them attending again. With so many people unhappy with wireless, these stats add up to charging more for better wireless The weird stat was 7% for whom $50US extra means they have to file paperwork to get the money (just eat less? :) I mea

Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC

2006-02-08 Thread Simon Josefsson
Tony, yes, I believe that would be fine. The best would be to ask debian-legal (or a similar community) to review it. They have experience in evaluating software licenses. I'll forward the updated language to them, and will relay any responses that indicate a problem. Generally, it is unfortuna