Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard

I cannot see why there's a debate going on here. If someone, anyone, can read a spec, and, in good faith, point out a possible ambiguity in the text, before the doc is finalised, and if fixing it to avoid the problem is easy, what possible justification can there be for not adding a few words

Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard

Robert Elz wrote: I cannot see why there's a debate going on here. If someone, anyone, can read a spec, and, in good faith, point out a possible ambiguity in the text, before the doc is finalised, and if fixing it to avoid the problem is easy, what possible justification can there be for not

Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard

Bill Strahm wrote: Robert Elz wrote: I cannot see why there's a debate going on here. If someone, anyone, can read a spec, and, in good faith, point out a possible ambiguity in the text, before the doc is finalised, and if fixing it to avoid the problem is easy, what possible justification