> Mohsen,
> it seems that Stephane tested the Chinese open root too much and
> meets some naming problems.
> Or that Stephane wants you, and others may-be, to be PR-defamacted
> one shot with me.
> jfc
>
> PS. I note his technical evaluation that "The problem is 100 %
> political and should be
At 15:26 02/03/2006, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:26:23AM -0800,
Jefsey Morfin, disguised as Mohsen BANAN
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 551 lines which said:
Mohsen,
it seems that Stephane tested the Chinese open root too much and
meets some naming problems.
Jason,
On Mar 2, 2006, at 7:44 AM, ext Livingood, Jason wrote:
Does this section mean that 802.11a is specifically not supported?
Any
idea if the wifi network at the Dallas meeting will be better than in
Vancouver?
The true test will be the meeting itself, but we are working hard to
try
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:26:23AM -0800,
Jefsey Morfin, disguised as Mohsen BANAN
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 551 lines which said:
> The Internet technical community is now given a unique opportunity
There is nothing to do for the IETF or the "Internet technical
community" (whateve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To any who reply to this thread: please, please trim the list of recipients
to remove any of the following addresses, unless you explicitly want to
address them:
* iab@iab.org
* iesg@ietf.org
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keith Moore wrote:
> when editi
Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] gloated:
> You puny creatures do not grasp my fiendish plan!
> Victory, your name is Plankton!
Somebody's been playing too much Evil Genius
--
Dave Aronson
Work: http://www.davearonson.com/
Play: http://www.davearonson.net/
_
when editing documents that purport to describe existing practices and
protocols, there is often a conflict between documenting existing
practice and describing desirable practice (or undesirable practice).
this conflict results in confusion of goals, and one possible result is
that the document de
You puny creatures do not grasp my fiendish plan! Victory, your name is
Plankton!
Well this sucks.
> -Original Message-
> From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:12 PM
> To: Brian E Carpenter; william(at)elan.net
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Su
(IETF seriously needs to address this. Please consider the
following and forward to all the appropriate interested parties.
If you are a blogger or know clueful bloggers, please post it in
a highly visible forum. -- Seth Johnson)
Hello folks,
Please review the important joint statement below
Dear Brian,
I am afraid you do not grasp yet what it represents for the Internet
architecture.
http://www.circleid.com/posts/chinas_new_domain_names_lost_in_translation
At 11:44 02/03/2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:...
Ignore China?
No, that would be foolish.
We automatically ignore any pseu
I agree here, Brian. Interoperabilty must be maintained. The issue is,
will China agree?
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> ...
> > Ignore China?
>
> No, that would be foolish.
>
> We automatically ignore any pseudo-TLD that only exists within
> a walled garden, because it is simpl
Hi Jason,
No actually the meaning is somehow that b/g are a must, basically because we
still have lots of laptops which only support those protocols, but from the
email exchange on this list some weeks ago regarding the network at Dallas,
it seems that "a" will be also a must in the future.
I'm a
On 02/03/06, Leslie Daigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On February 8, 2006, The IAB received an appeal from Julian Mehnle
> appealing the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core as an
> Experimental RFC. According to the procedures in Section 6.5.2 of RFC
> 2026, the IAB has reviewed the
Does this section mean that 802.11a is specifically not supported? Any
idea if the wifi network at the Dallas meeting will be better than in
Vancouver?
Regards
Jason
3.3. Wireless Network
IEEE 802.11b/g service must be available in all the meeting rooms (as
identified by the Secretariat)
> What I find fascinating here is the way that certain people think that
> an action taken at the state level by the most populous nation on earth
[...]
> with the largest army, nuclear weapons,
Do you mean ... US ;-) ?
> third largest GNP etc. somehow
> validates the splinter roots set up by
What I find fascinating here is the way that certain people think that
an action taken at the state level by the most populous nation on earth
with the largest army, nuclear weapons, third largest GNP etc. somehow
validates the splinter roots set up by assorted crackpots rather than
demonstrating t
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
Ignore China?
No, that would be foolish.
It is foolish.
We automatically ignore any pseudo-TLD that only exists within
a walled garden, because it is simply invisible outside.
It isn't part of the global Internet. If it appears in any
way outside the walled
Mohsen BANAN wrote:
More than 5 years ago I predicted what the Chinese
government announced today.
This action by the chinese was done three years ago. This is not a new
event.
regards
joe
What happened today:
http://english.people.com.cn/200602/28/eng20060228_246712.html
http://www.in
Second call for nominations
---
The NomCom has been asked to fill the Transport Area Director position
now vacant as a result of Jon Peterson's nomination to Real-time
Applications and Infrastructure Area Director and resignation from his
position as Transport Area Director
On February 8, 2006, The IAB received an appeal from Julian Mehnle
appealing the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core as an
Experimental RFC. According to the procedures in Section 6.5.2 of RFC
2026, the IAB has reviewed the situation and issues the following
response.
1. Summary of
...
Ignore China?
No, that would be foolish.
We automatically ignore any pseudo-TLD that only exists within
a walled garden, because it is simply invisible outside.
It isn't part of the global Internet. If it appears in any
way outside the walled garden, it is meaningless.
I think there are a
More than 5 years ago I predicted what the Chinese
government announced today.
What happened today:
http://english.people.com.cn/200602/28/eng20060228_246712.html
http://www.interfax.cn/showfeature.asp?aid=10411&slug=INTERNET-POLICY-MII-DOMAIN%20NAME-DNS
http://www.domainesinfo.fr/vie_extensions
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:46:42 -0800 (PST), "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
William> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
>>
>>> From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Dear Phillip,
>>> Full agreement. Let not confuse alt-ro
23 matches
Mail list logo
