Out-of-Office AutoReply: draft-ietf-geopriv-location-types-registry-06.txt updated by Amy Vezza

2006-05-31 Thread Ted Hardie
I will be out of the office until June 4th. It is possible that I will have intermittent connectivity, but please do not count on immediate replies. If this is an urgent IESG/AD matter, please contact my co-AD, Lisa Dusseault, at lisa at osafoundation.org. Thanks, Ted Hardie

RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control

2006-05-31 Thread Margaret Wasserman
Hi Eliot, I disagree. Just as I expect you to use your judgment on the IESG I expect the IAB to use their judgment. Community oversight comes in the form of the NOMCOM. If you believe that oversight is not effective, then let's discuss that instead. If an AD or the IESG makes a

Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control

2006-05-31 Thread Fred Baker
On May 31, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Margaret Wasserman wrote: If an AD or the IESG makes a mistake, there is also an appeals mechanism available. There isn't any documented appeals mechanism for IAB decisions. Should there be? Actually, there is. See section 6.5.3 of RFC 2026. As with an appeal

Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control

2006-05-31 Thread Bill Fenner
On 5/31/06, Fred Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 31, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Margaret Wasserman wrote: There isn't any documented appeals mechanism for IAB decisions. Should there be? Actually, there is. See section 6.5.3 of RFC 2026. Fred, Do you read that as being able to say the IAB

Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control

2006-05-31 Thread Fred Baker
On May 31, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Bill Fenner wrote: Do you read that as being able to say the IAB made a mistake in their (RFC Editor selection|liaison management|other IAB-assigned task)? I read it as being able to say the IAB upheld my appeal to the IESG because RFC 2026 supports them, but

EAP Extensions (EAPExt) BoF Proposal Discussion

2006-05-31 Thread Narayanan, Vidya
Folks, We have set up a mailing list to discuss next steps on EAP keying and the work that needs to be done there. We invite people to subscribe to the EAPExt mailing list at https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eapext. The following drafts and other material are intended to stimulate initial

Protocol Action: 'Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application' to Proposed Standard

2006-05-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application ' draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-12.txt as a Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Authentication, Authorization and Accounting Working Group. The IESG contact persons

RFC Editor RFI

2006-05-31 Thread IETF Administrative Director
The Internet Engineering Task Force Administrative Oversight Committee plans to issue a Request for Proposal in 2006 for the performance of the RFC Editor functions. To that end the IAOC is issuing a Request for Information to identify organizations interested in pursuing contract award, as well

RFC 4473 on Requirements for Internet Media Guides (IMGs)

2006-05-31 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4473 Title: Requirements for Internet Media Guides (IMGs) Author: Y. Nomura, R. Walsh, J-P. Luoma, J. Ott, H.