Paul Robinson wrote:
This is not an economic battle. People think it is, because they see the
motive behind spam as profit, and if you make spam expensive enough the
battle will be won, but it will always be possible for them to make it
cheap enough somehow.
soapbox
It's clear that profit
John Levine wrote:
ICANN has not to date dealt very effectively with these issues, but
they are real issues that will have a great effect on people who use
the DNS every day, and they're not technical issues, since all of the
alternatives are equally feasible technically.
At its base, IDN is
ICANN has not to date dealt very effectively with these issues, but
they are real issues that will have a great effect on people who use
the DNS every day, and they're not technical issues, since all of the
alternatives are equally feasible technically.
At its base, IDN is a technical matter.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
John L wrote:
At its base, IDN is a technical matter. That is the realm of the
IETF, not ICANN. ICANN can deploy and administer solutions developed
in the IETF, but it cannot create them. That's not its job and it's
not its
John L wrote:
There are both technical issues and non-technical issues.
[...]
BTW, I liked your travel-sitefinder statement on behalf of ALAC.
Frank
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
