Joe Touch wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2007-06-27 15:52, Joe Touch wrote:
Keith Moore wrote:
We could have more ADs and split and/or layer the work to reduce the
per-person load. That may not be the only - or even best - way forward,
It's not clearly even a
On 2007-06-27 20:46, Tony Li wrote:
I don't see increasing the areas; I see splitting them down as a
possible way. Leaving an AD at the top level with less work, and having
sub-ADs report to them.
It's well known that when dealing with a scalability issue, the way to
address the issue is
On 2007-06-27 17:42, Michael Thomas wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
One thing that would make a significant difference would be if WGs
really took responsibility for their own quality control. Even at the
trivial level, the IESG still gets drafts that don't pass ID-nits
(but that is getting
Harald Alvestrand wrote:
Joe Touch wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
I don't see increasing the areas; I see splitting them down as a
possible way. Leaving an AD at the top level with less work, and having
sub-ADs report to them.
draft-iesg-alvestrand-twolevel, published October 2003,
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2007-06-27 17:42, Michael Thomas wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
One thing that would make a significant difference would be if WGs
really took responsibility for their own quality control. Even at the
trivial level, the IESG still gets drafts that don't pass
DHCP is also a frequently-used building block (some would say
attractive nuisance). Stig, Jari and I are trying to identify drafts
from outside the dhc WG that extend DHCP or use DHCP in novel ways,
so we can provide guidance to the authors of those drafts as early as
possible. Jari and
This draft lays out what is destine to become email acceptance
criteria based upon DKIM signing practices. DKIM depends upon public-
key cryptography and uses public keys published under temporary
labels below a _domainkey domain that must be at or above the
identity being signed to meet
Folks,
As per the announced timeline
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/show_nomcom_message.cgi?id=1231),
which is 3777-compliant, the method of random selection was to be
announced on July 6, 2007. I am presenting it earlier for your review.
In the past few cycles, nomcom chairs have
There are two (2) Internet-Draft cutoff dates for the 69th
IETF Meeting in Chicago, IL, USA:
July 2nd: Cutoff Date for Initial (i.e., version -00)
Internet-Draft Submissions
All initial Internet-Drafts (version -00) must be submitted by Monday,
July 2nd at 9:00 AM ET. As always, all initial
