+1
I would offer the page *does* look really nice. How do you think people
would react if we made the Daily Dose http://www.ietf.org?
But seriously, I would hesitate putting the Daily Dose at news.ietf.org,
just because so many people are hard-wired for news.* to refer to a NNTP
server.
Very few patents are on the light bulb. Most are on better filaments.
This highlights one reason why the system encourages people to patent
stuff. If I want to market foo, which is an improvement on bar, then
the owner of the patent on bar hopefully wants access to my improvement
foo, which
Eric Burger wrote:
But seriously, I would hesitate putting the Daily Dose at news.ietf.org,
just because so many people are hard-wired for news.* to refer to a NNTP
server. http://www.ietf.org/news seems like a much more logical place.
+1 for either, but in fact they are not mutually
Just a reminder
I have not yet seen a request for time on the IPR agenda that is backed
with an I-D fulfilling the criteria laid out below.
Simon's free software guideline exists as an I-D, but I have not had a
request to put it on the agenda.
The deadline for -00 I-Ds is in a week.
