IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber

2008-02-29 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
What's going on with the preparations to turn off IPv4 at IETF-71? It's been really quiet surrounding that topic since the initial discussion. Because I've had an IPv6 mail server for years and a WWW proxy that allows IPv6-only hosts to get access to the IPv4 web is fairly trivial to set

Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber

2008-02-29 Thread Ralph Droms
Iljitsch raises an interesting point that I'll generalize: can we maximize the learning by identifying specific applications to target for IPv6 compatibility during the IPv4 eclipse? - Ralph On Feb 29, 2008, at Feb 29, 2008,9:34 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: What's going on with the

Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber

2008-02-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 35 lines which said: What's going on with the preparations to turn off IPv4 at IETF-71? It's been really quiet surrounding that topic since the initial discussion. Because IPv6-only events

Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber

2008-02-29 Thread Leslie Daigle
Hi, To the basic question of the IPv4 outage -- preparations are indeed underway, to implement it as Russ described on 12/22/2007[1]. Early next week, there will be a wiki page accessible specifically for our event, providing more detail and more pointers. In the meantime, if you have specific

Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber

2008-02-29 Thread Lucy Lynch
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:34:41PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 35 lines which said: What's going on with the preparations to turn off IPv4 at IETF-71? It's been really quiet surrounding that topic since the

Missing materials

2008-02-29 Thread Eric Rescorla
I just ran getdrafts [0] on the entire agenda. The output is below. getdrafts reports three kinds of errors: - WGs without agendas: As you can see 42/98 WGs have no agendas two days after the agenda deadline. - Missing drafts: Drafts on an agenda which can't be found [1] -

Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt

2008-02-29 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Hi, Sean, This is much better than I feared. There were just too many places in -03 where I was guessing what was intended, for me to say ready for publication, or even almost ready with nits. I know you don't make the decisions about when drafts are last-called, but when you talk to your

Audio Streaming - IETF 71 Philadelphia, PA, USA 9-14 March 2008

2008-02-29 Thread Joel Jaeggli
Greetings, All 8 parallel tracks will be broadcast starting with the commencement of working group sessions on Monday March 10 at 0900 EST (UTC-5) and continue until Friday at 1130 EST. Additionally it is our intention to broadcast the IEPG meeting occurring on Sunday the 9th starting at 1000

Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05

2008-02-29 Thread Olaf Kolkman
The IAB is ready to ask the RFC-Editor to publish Design Choices When Expanding DNS draft-iab-dns-choices-05 as an Informational RFC. This document provides a number of considerations to assist application and protocol designers in choosing a mechanism to store and retrieve

Last Call: draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy (Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys from an Extended Master Session Key (EMSK)) to Proposed Standard

2008-02-29 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Handover Keying WG (hokey) to consider the following document: - 'Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys from an Extended Master Session Key (EMSK) ' draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a

RFC 5098 on Signaling MIB for PacketCable and IPCablecom Multimedia Terminal Adapters (MTAs)

2008-02-29 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5098 Title: Signaling MIB for PacketCable and IPCablecom Multimedia Terminal Adapters (MTAs) Author: G. Beacham, S. Kumar, S.