Spencer,
Thanks for taking the time to read the draft. Responses are inline.
spt
-Original Message-
From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:27 AM
To: General Area Review Team
Cc: Sean Turner; Blake Ramsdell; ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gonzalo,
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Denis,
Thanks for taking the time to review this ID. Responses are inline.
spt
-Original Message-
There are obvious errors (intentionnaly left by the editor in
order to know how many people read the document).
If I was going to leave something intentionally in the document to see if
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
At 4:06 PM -0500 2/29/08, Turner, Sean P. wrote:
In addition, it is not acceptable to reference in the
*normative* references work in progess, i.e.[ECCADD].
I'm pretty sure this is done all the time. There are 17 IDs in the RFC
editor queue with works-in-progress in normative references.
Sean
Hello!
My name is Stefan Winter of the National Research and Education Network in
Luxembourg, RESTENA. We are an ISP for academia and take the lead in research
and development of a global academic wireless LAN federated roaming
consortium: eduroam. This is based on EAP and 802.1X exclusively.
I managed to sneak in two errors:
1. a February 23 deadline, that should have been March 28
2. a link to version 03 of the document, that should have
been 05.
For completeness:
The IAB is ready to ask the RFC-Editor to publish
Design Choices When Expanding DNS
