Hi Folks,
I requested a letter of Invitation for the Dublin Meeting and I
noticed the following issues.
* I cannot register first and then come back for the letter of
invitation. I get the following error
You will need to register for the IETF meeting prior to requesting a
letter of
Suresh,
Thank you for your email. We are looking into these issues right now and
will advise you, and the community, as soon as we have made the necessary
repairs.
Regards,
Alexa
---
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538
Phone:
Hi,
I agree with Russ. I think the trust and the IAOC have a bit different focus
and it makes sense at times have a different chair for the different
positions.
This does not mean that we couldn't go in the future back to the common
IAOC/Trust chair, but currently the work split would make
As one of the 2 PR-action'ed persons, let me respond to these
assertions.
I was subject of a PR-Action in fall of 2005 because I did three things:
1) I asked for honesty in the sources of claims in the controverial
spamops document. The discredited source was SORBS, which falsely
claims
Is this saying that inter-domain handoff is not supported? My
understanding is that ERX supports inter-domain use, no?
I understand the restriction for other uses though (such as OTA
Provisioning).
-Original Message-
From: Charles Clancy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April
Hi,
I have reviewed draft-ietf-lemonade-convert-17.txt as part of the
Operations and Management directorate effort. These comments were
primarily written for the benefit of the OM area directors. Document
editors and WG chairs
should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
Russ,
The IETF Trust was set up as an instrument -- a naturally limited scope.
The specific task you identify below (paying attention to items) could
reasonably be addressed as Harald suggested.
Giving the Trust a chair is at least a step towards acknowledging it as a
separate organization
Leslie wrote:
Giving the Trust a chair is at least a step towards acknowledging
it as a separate organization ...
I suppose you could interpret things this way, but that is not my view.
Since its creation back in December 2005, all meetings of IETF Trustees
have been convened and chaired by
I hope that other IAOC members will share their thoughts too. Here are mine.
Right now, the IETF Trust is faced with more work than usual. The
IPR WG has placed a significant task on the IETF Trust. Yet, all of
the usual IAOC activities need to go forward on the usual
schedule. The reason
On Apr 8, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Leslie Daigle wrote:
Giving the Trust a chair is at least a step towards acknowledging
it as a separate organization (beyond instrument), and one could
then examine whether the IAOC members are, in fact, the right
people to populate it (for example). It
(Oops, sent from wrong account--sorry for the repeat.)
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last
Thanks Ray, that is reassuring.
I don't think this decreases the need for the -outbound document to be
as clear as possible about what the IETF needs are, though.
/Simon
Ray Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In their April 3, 2008 meeting, the IETF Trustees discussed the
outbound-IPR
--On Tuesday, 08 April, 2008 16:30 -0400 Ed Juskevicius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The above being said, it is quite clear from the excellent
comments posted by several people on this topic that the
Trustees have more work to do before the job of revising the
text on the Administrative
My name is Chad Christopher Giffin. My nickname is (typo). I have been a
member of the internet community since 1994.
The following posting is a proposal for a protocol that would allow
anonynimity to a user on the internet. Please evaluate the proposal and
provide any and all
--On Tuesday, 08 April, 2008 14:25 -0700 Fred Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Leslie Daigle wrote:
Giving the Trust a chair is at least a step towards
acknowledging it as a separate organization (beyond
instrument), and one could then examine whether the
John,
On 2008-04-09 12:55, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Tuesday, 08 April, 2008 16:30 -0400 Ed Juskevicius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The above being said, it is quite clear from the excellent
comments posted by several people on this topic that the
Trustees have more work to do before
The IESG has received a request from the Mobility for IP: Performance,
Signaling and Handoff Optimization WG (mipshop) to consider the following
document:
- 'Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management (HMIPv6) '
draft-ietf-mipshop-4140bis-02.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to
17 matches
Mail list logo
