--On Wednesday, 09 July, 2008 14:25 -0700 Ted Hardie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2:03 PM -0700 7/9/08, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>> I propose
>> the following as alternative text:
>
> A nit with this:
>
>
>>"6. Addresses used in I-Ds SHOULD use fully qualified
>>domain name
John C Klensin wrote:
(iii) The IETF has indicated enough times that domain
names, not literal addresses, should be used in both
protocols and documents that doing anything else should
reasonably require clear and strong justification.
I take issue with that as
At 2:03 PM -0700 7/9/08, John C Klensin wrote:
>I propose
>the following as alternative text:
A nit with this:
>"6. Addresses used in I-Ds SHOULD use fully qualified
>domain names (FQDNs) instead of literal IP addresses.
>Working Groups or authors seeing exemptions from
--On Wednesday, 09 July, 2008 10:19 -0400 Thomas Narten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And on the particular question of example DNS names:
>
>
>> 6. Addresses used in examples SHOULD use fully qualified
>> domain names instead of literal IP addresses, and SHOULD use
>> example fqdn's such
6. Addresses used in examples SHOULD use fully qualified domain names
instead of literal IP addresses, and SHOULD use example fqdn's
such as foo.example.com instead of real-world fqdn's. See
[RFC2606] (Eastlake, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS
Names," June 1999.) for e
hi Robert,
i would recommend IRC #ipv6 at freenode.net , about 100 people
hangout there , some experts also;)
good luck
Marc
Am 09.07.2008 um 21:46 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
IPv6 delegation now up on my PPPoE link. Next to get internal
routing and discovery working
My ISP is read
IPv6 delegation now up on my PPPoE link. Next to get internal routing
and discovery working
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
My ISP is ready to give me an IPv6 allocation. Prefix is all ready to
go, all I have to do is get PPPoE for Centos 5.2 configured right.
Then I set up IP6tables to get the a
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:54:24PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > I don't "want" anything in this space. I don't care if the root's
> > unchanged or as wide as .com.
>
> There was a clear decision to move from a single label
> hostnames to multiple label hostnames (RFC 921). You are
Bill McQuillan wrote:
> I wonder if it would make it easier to use "example" DNS
> names if, in addition to the verbose and clumsy: "*.example",
> IMHO, we reserved gTLDs like "*.foo", "*.bar", "*.bat",
> "*.baz", as well as the one used quite frequently on this
> list lately: "*.tld", for use as
hi, bill,
I wonder if it would make it easier to use "example" DNS names if, in
addition to the verbose and clumsy: "*.example", IMHO, we reserved gTLDs
like "*.foo", "*.bar", "*.bat", "*.baz", as well as the one used quite
frequently on this list lately: "*.tld", for use as example DNS names.
At 9:37 AM -0700 7/9/08, Bill McQuillan wrote:
I wonder if it would make it easier to use "example" DNS names if, in
addition to the verbose and clumsy: "*.example", IMHO, we reserved gTLDs
like "*.foo", "*.bar", "*.bat", "*.baz", as well as the one used quite
frequently on this list lately: "*.t
On Wed, 2008-07-09, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> If an example describes a complex network topology, it could be
> appropriate to use a variety of names, IP addresses or prefixes that are
> easily disambiguated, so that the reader might follow the example more
> easily.
I wonder if it would make i
Dear IESG,
From the discussion just prior to the recent appeal by John Klensin, it
was clear that the guidance regarding example domain names in IETF
documents provided in the ID-Checklist needed to be updated. This point
was emphasized further during the discussion of the Klensin appeal.
Propo
Hi All,
I have a query in the draft Managed Objects for ATM over
Packet Switched Network (draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-atm-mib-05.txt) mentioned
below. Can you please reply to that as early as possible.
The pwAtmCfgTable consists of MaxCellConctenation,
FarEndMaxCellConcatenation, Timeout mode and C
John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I agree, I believe that it would be of great help if the
> IESG gave indications of the situations in which an exception
> to a "SHOULD" would be appropriate.
Yes.
And on the particular question of example DNS names:
> 6. Addresses used in e
Mark Andrews wrote:
...
"hk" is not a legal fully qualified host name.
Agreed. "hk.", however, is.
No, it is not a legal hostname.
RFC 952 explicitly excludes trailing periods.
RFC 952 is not a standard.
Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:34:59PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:11:35PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> > And vanity TLDs are going to be much more attractive if people think
> > they can get single-label host names out of them.
>
> Of your concerns (which I don't have the rel
17 matches
Mail list logo
