Re: WG Review: Low Extra Delay Background Transport (ledbat)

2008-10-31 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:02:30 -0700 (PDT) From:IESG Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This looks like useful work to do, and to me, the charter mostly looks fine, just one point. The (proposed) charter says ... | * operate well in networks

Re: WG Review: Low Extra Delay Background Transport (ledbat)

2008-10-31 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, On 2008-10-31, at 10:45, ext Robert Elz wrote: This looks like useful work to do, and to me, the charter mostly looks fine, just one point. The (proposed) charter says ... | * operate well in networks with FIFO queueing with drop-tail | discipline which in itself is OK, but doesn't say

RE: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework (Frameworkfor Establishing an SRTP Security Context using DTLS) to ProposedStandard

2008-10-31 Thread Pasi.Eronen
Hi Thierry, There's ample precedent for using self-signed certificates to carry public keys in situations where a bare public key mode (if TLS/DTLS had it -- IKEv2 does have this, BTW) would have worked, too. Exactly the same approach as in this draft (exchange fingerprints via SDP, and use

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-05

2008-10-31 Thread Elwyn Davies
This all seems fine to me.. I'll take a look at the next version when it appears. No worries on the delay... you should see some of mine ;-) /Elwyn Mark Watson wrote: Elwyn, all, Please accept my apologies for the excessive delay in addressing these comments. My plan for addressing these in

Re: WG Review: Low Extra Delay Background Transport (ledbat)

2008-10-31 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:24:39 +0200 From:Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The first bullet says deal with the world as it is; the second | says deal with the world as you wish it were | | I think that is a very sensible

Document Action: 'The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) P-Refused-URI-List Private-Header (P-Header)' to Informational RFC

2008-10-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) P-Refused-URI-List Private-Header (P-Header) ' draft-hautakorpi-sipping-uri-list-handling-refused-03.txt as an Informational RFC This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an

73rd IETF - Final Agenda

2008-10-31 Thread IETF Secretariat
73rd IETF Meeting - Minneapolis, MN November 16-21, 2008 Host: Google The final agenda has been posted. Please note that changes to the agenda may still occur. You can view the agenda at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/73/agenda.html The social event will be held at GameWorks, you can

73rd IETF - Final Agenda

2008-10-31 Thread IETF Secretariat
Please remember that while this does say Final Agenda, changes may happen to the agenda up until and during the meeting. We are experiencing two issues with the web agenda, the tool is not listing the name of the area directors and the break times on Wednesday are not correct, they should be as

RFC 5381 on Experience of Implementing NETCONF over SOAP

2008-10-31 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5381 Title: Experience of Implementing NETCONF over SOAP Author: T. Iijima, Y. Atarashi, H. Kimura, M. Kitani, H.

Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto (RSVP Extensions for Path-Triggered RSVP Receiver Proxy) to Proposed Standard

2008-10-31 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Transport Area Working Group WG (tsvwg) to consider the following documents: - 'RSVP Extensions for Path-Triggered RSVP Receiver Proxy ' draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto-07.txt as a Proposed Standard - 'RSVP Proxy Approaches '