At 10:57 20-02-2009, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
All of the issues Mr. Otis raises have been given substantially more than a
normal amount of consideration, yet they have failed to attract any detectable
consensus. Disagreement with both his concerns and his proposed remedies is
ample and
e mailin
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
At 7:06 PM -0800 2/20/09, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Stephen Kent wrote:
At 9:00 PM -0800 2/19/09, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Just as a matter of observation, ...
...
I have not read the doc in
question,...
Hey guys. As someone who is frequently faced with trying to parse
out what are
On Feb 19, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received an appeal regarding the previously approved
draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-20. The appeal text can be
found here:
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/appeal-otis-2009-02-16.txt
This note offers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello, folks,
I have just seen that there has been a thread about this document in
this list, so here's a related announcement:
Last week the UK CPNI (United Kingdom's Centre for the Protection of
National Infrastructure) released the document
2009/2/14 Lars Eggert lars.egg...@nokia.com
during the discussions around the TCP implementation deficiencies
publicized by the Outpost24 last fall, we discussed with CERT-FI and others
in that community that the IETF would offer to be the venue for publishing
such a document.
It has
