Masataka,
The reality, instead, is that actual networks running IPv4 and IPv6
***CAN'T*** deal with renumbering, because of their inertia.
While I obviously have sympathy for the sentiment, I think your
statement is too strong. I believe it would be better to say that end
users have an
Eric Rescorla wrote:
Can you clarify what, if any, the security properties of this system
are:
In particular:
1. Will the RFID tag in question respond to any reader or just those
controlled by the secretariat?
2. Is the information on the tag in the clear or encrypted?
normal
At Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:05:08 -0700,
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Eric Rescorla wrote:
Can you clarify what, if any, the security properties of this system
are:
In particular:
1. Will the RFID tag in question respond to any reader or just those
controlled by the secretariat?
2.
At Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:23:31 -0700 (PDT),
Ole Jacobsen wrote:
An Overview of the RFID Experiment for IETF 76 in Hiroshima.
Some of the details are still being worked out, but here is a summary:
Basics
--
* Each
Inline.
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Eric Rescorla wrote:
At Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:23:31 -0700 (PDT),
* Each attendee will be issued an RFID card at the registration desk.
The information stored on the card is ONLY a number, no personal
data is stored on the card. (Note: the attendee can
Ole Jacobsen wrote:
Inline.
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Eric Rescorla wrote:
At Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:23:31 -0700 (PDT),
* Each attendee will be issued an RFID card at the registration desk.
The information stored on the card is ONLY a number, no personal
data is stored on the card.
Hi,
It occurs to me that a small but potentially meaningful thing that the
IETF could do to push IPv6 adoption is move RFC 2460 from draft
standard to standard.
Iljitsch
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noel Chiappa wrote:
From: Stephan Wenger st...@stewe.org
For the IETF as an organization, I see no value beyond traditions in
staying with the RFC publication model. (The marketing value of using
the RFC series is IMHO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:19:05AM -0700, Dave CROCKER wrote:
First, you lack empirical data to substantiate your assessment of the
perception.
Well, Wikipedia (which IMO is primarily useful as a repository for
finding
On Sep 10, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the follow up. Please see answers inline.
Regards,
Ahmad
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of
draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10
This
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the follow up. Please see answers inline.
Regards,
Ahmad
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of
draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10
This is a followup on revision 12, since it came
This is a followup on revision 12, since it came out before I got to
revision 11:
Overall, I think this revision is much better. Most of my concerns
have been addressed, but I have a few minor ones remaining.
Specific comments:
-- Section 10.1, 2nd bullet:
I don't think we resolved my
Hi Stanislav,
thanks for your comments. With respect to including more examples of P2P
systems, we received similar comments in the past. Some people thought
(like you) that a document having a high number of examples (maybe even
an almost-exhaustive list) would be useful for the community.
Eliot,
We'll respond in detail to your helpful comments in due course.
However,
Still, I would argue strongly for inclusion of a fuller discussion about
technologies that obviate the need to renumber.
The hypothesis of the document is there will always be circumstances in
which partial or
For this and other RFCs, we started some years ago the work at
http://www.ipv6-to-standard.org
Just waiting for the IESG to take on it ...
Regards,
Jordi
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum iljit...@muada.com
Reply-To: ietf-boun...@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:24:54 +0200
To: IETF
Eliot Lear wrote:
The reality, instead, is that actual networks running IPv4 and IPv6
***CAN'T*** deal with renumbering, because of their inertia.
While I obviously have sympathy for the sentiment, I think your
statement is too strong. I believe it would be better to say that end
users have
L.S.
This is to inform you that the IAB selected Henk Uijterwaal as the IETF
appointed member to the ICANN 2010 Nomcom.
The IAB would like to thank Ole Jacobsen for serving on the 2008 and 2009
ICANN Nomcom.
For the IAB,
--Olaf Kolkman
IAB chair.
The IESG has received a request from the IP Security Maintenance and
Extensions WG (ipsecme) to consider the following document:
- 'IPv6 Configuration in IKEv2 '
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-ipv6-config-02.txt as an Experimental RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
18 matches
Mail list logo
