Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com writes:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:00:58PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
I'm hesitant to bring this up because it has so many other concerns, but
if you are looking for alternatives, another one is to flag the
normalization algorithm used in the
Ole Jacobsen wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Eric Rescorla wrote:
So, this isn't really that useful context for the rest of the
paragraph. To take the example of encryption, I think people
were arguing that it was a topic regarding human rights.
With that said, it's not clear to me that
Dean Willis wrote:
The question: does meeting in China do more to further the goal of
getting past PRC (and others) deplorable policies than does meeting
elsewhere AND LETTING THE WORLD KNOW WHY WE ARE NOT MEETING IN CHINA.
Dean,
Sorry, but that is very much *not* the question. As a group
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Dean Willis wrote:
Because China's policy on censoring the Internet sucks, and we have
a moral and ethical responsibility to make the Internet available
despite that policy. If this requires technology changes, then that
technology is within our purview. If it
Regarding the potential clause in the contract that has caused this discussion,
which includes the text:
... Should there be any financial
loss incurred to the Hotel or damage caused to the Hotel's
reputation as a result of any or all of the above acts, the Hotel
will claim
